EnterviewGo
Paid
Job candidates needing real-time interview prompts
Generic ATS checkers return a vague score and a list of buzzwords to add — none of which tell you why your resume actually failed the filter. ScorAxis breaks the score into a deterministic rubric you can audit and AI dimensions you can action, so you know exactly which line to fix before you hit submit.
The tool takes a text-based PDF, runs it through six frozen deterministic checks worth 70 points and five AI dimensions worth 30, and returns a 0–100 score in about 15 seconds. The deterministic rubric is public and version-locked, which means the same resume returns the same score within ±3 points — a meaningful guarantee when you're iterating across drafts. Free accounts get two scans per day and five total, which covers a targeted job search but hits a hard wall if you're actively testing five resume variants against the same posting. The Pro tier with unlimited scans, score history, and markdown export is on a waitlist at time of writing, so the ceiling on free use is real and the paid upgrade is not self-serve. Scanned PDFs are rejected outright — text-based exports only.
Bottom line: Pick this for a fast, auditable compatibility check before submitting to a specific role; hit its ceiling the moment you need to run batch comparisons across more than five resume versions or require an API to plug scoring into your own workflow.
For one-off applications. No credit card required.
For active job seekers. Cancel anytime.
Best long-haul value. u20b94,999/yr (u20b9417/mo billed yearly). Billed once per year, cancel anytime.
View full pricing on scoraxis.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Find your fit
More options in HR & Recruiting. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Paid
Job candidates needing real-time interview prompts
Paid
Small to scaling recruitment teams
ScorAxis scores a resume against ATS compatibility criteria without requiring a job description upload — the workflow is upload a text-based PDF, wait 15 seconds, receive a 0–100 score with plain-English explanations of the top issues. The score combines six deterministic checks (contact info, section presence, word count, bullet structure, date consistency, layout) with five AI dimensions (action verbs, quantified impact, keyword density, tense consistency, buzzword overuse). Both the checks and their weights are documented on the vendor’s methodology page, which is uncommon in this category.
The differentiating design decision is the deterministic/AI split. The deterministic rubric is frozen at v1 for reproducibility, so structural issues — missing sections, broken date formats, layout problems — return a consistent result across every run. The AI half carries a ±3 point variance across calls, which the vendor discloses explicitly. That transparency is the real differentiator: you know which part of your score is stable and which part reflects model variance.
The tool fits a job seeker doing one-off checks before submitting applications — the free tier handles that use case without a credit card. It breaks for anyone running volume comparisons: five total free scans across the account is a hard cap, the Pro tier is waitlisted rather than self-serve, and there is no API to automate scoring. Scanned PDFs are rejected at upload; text-based exports from LinkedIn, Word, Google Docs, Naukri, and Pages are confirmed to work. Resume files are stored encrypted on AWS in the ap-south-1 region and are deletable on request, which the vendor documents on a dedicated privacy page.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.