Screenshots 2
is.team
Summary
Tasks live in Jira, context lives in Slack, and the whiteboard is in Miro — and when a meeting produces action items, someone manually bridges all three. is.team is built to collapse that gap.
The tool puts tasks, chat, planning, and AI agents on a single infinite canvas. Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT connect over MCP, subscribe to a board, and reply in card chat while they work — not in a separate sidebar, but next to your team's tasks. A meeting bot transcribes calls and drops action items directly onto the board. The workflow planner takes a plain-language description and generates phases, tasks, story points, and assignments. The ceiling appears when teams need deep Jira-style reporting or complex conditional automations — at that point, you're either working around the canvas or exporting data elsewhere.
Bottom line: Pick this for a startup or small team that wants AI agents embedded in the board from day one — but if your workflow requires enterprise-grade reporting or branching automation logic beyond simple task generation, you'll hit the canvas ceiling and be looking at a different architecture.
Pricing Plans
Subscription- Price
- $16/mo flat for 15 people
- Free Tier
- 3 seats, 2 boards per workspace, 10 columns per board, 5 notes per board, 100 MB storage
Free
3 seats, 2 boards, 10 columns, 100 MB storage
- Unlimited tasks
- Basic features
Starter
5 seats, 5 boards, 25 columns, 1 GB storage
- Early adopter 80% off
Pro
15 seats, 15 boards, unlimited columns, 5 GB storage
- Recommended
- Early adopter 80% off
Max
50 seats, unlimited boards, 5 GB storage
- Early adopter 80% off
View full pricing on is.team →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Community Performance Report Card
No community ratings yet. Be the first to rate this tool!
Pros
Sign in to edit- AI agents connect via MCP and operate directly inside the board's card chat, so agent output and team context live in one place instead of requiring manual copy-paste between a chat tool and a task tracker.
- Meeting bot attends calls, transcribes, and drops extracted action items as tasks onto the board automatically, which means the gap between 'we discussed it' and 'it exists as a trackable task' closes without a human intermediary.
- Flat-rate pricing covers 15 seats, so growing from 8 to 14 people doesn't trigger a per-seat billing event that requires CFO approval.
- AI workflow planner generates phases, tasks, story points, and team assignments from a plain-language description, so a new project can have a structured board in minutes rather than a planning session.
- GitHub, Slack, Google Calendar, Zapier, and Make integrations are included out of the box, so teams avoid the plugin marketplace negotiation that other tools charge separately for.
Cons
Sign in to edit- No API is available, so teams that need to push or pull board data programmatically — feeding is.team into a data warehouse, syncing with an internal tool, or building a custom integration — have no path forward. They revert to Zapier or Make as a middleware workaround, which adds a third system to maintain.
- No self-hosted option exists and no on-premise configuration is described anywhere in the vendor's documentation, which means teams operating under data residency requirements, SOC 2 Type II audits requiring infrastructure control, or enterprise security policies that prohibit third-party SaaS for project data cannot deploy this tool at all — that's the condition under which they stay on Jira or move to a self-hostable alternative.
- Complex conditional automation logic — branching based on task state, multi-step agent handoffs with different paths depending on prior output — is not described as a supported feature. Teams building anything beyond linear AI task generation will add a Zapier or Make layer, and at that point they are managing two workflow systems instead of one.
- The canvas model scales well for small teams but the vendor targets 15-person flat pricing as the core pitch; teams larger than that with multi-board, multi-project reporting needs will find analytics depth limited compared to tools built around enterprise portfolio management.
About
- Platforms
- Web
- API Available
- No
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- 2026-09-16T10:30:18.013Z
Best For
Who it's for
- Engineering leads managing cross-tool workflows
- CTOs seeking flat pricing for small teams
- Startups needing day-1 productivity without migration
- Teams using Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT for project work
What it does well
- AI agents autonomously building tasks from meetings or descriptions
- Replacing Jira, Miro, and Slack with one canvas
- AI transcribing meetings and extracting action items as tasks
- Generating workflow plans with phases, tasks, and assignments
- Team collaboration with real-time AI replies in card chat
Integrations
Add notes, reviews, and benchmarks so the next visitor gets a clearer picture.
Compare is.team
Spotted incorrect or missing data? Join our community of contributors.
Sign Up to ContributeFrequently Asked Questions
- Is is.team free?
- is.team has a permanent free tier alongside paid upgrades (paid plans from $16/mo flat for 15 people). You can keep using a baseline version indefinitely without paying.
- Is is.team open source?
- No — is.team is a closed-source tool. Source code is not publicly available.
- What platforms does is.team support?
- is.team is available on: Web.
Curated lists that include this category
Tasks live in Jira, context lives in Slack, and the whiteboard is in Miro
When a meeting produces action items, someone manually bridges all three. is.team puts tasks, chat, planning, and AI agents on a single infinite canvas. Claude, Cursor, and ChatGPT connect over MCP, subscribe to a board, and reply in card chat while they work. A meeting bot transcribes calls and drops action items directly onto the board. The workflow planner takes a plain-language description and generates phases, tasks, story points, and assignments.
Pricing and limits
The vendor lists a flat $16/mo rate that covers 15 people. A free tier allows 3 seats, 2 boards per workspace, 10 columns per board, 5 notes per board, and 100 MB storage.
Integrations and limits
Supported connections include GitHub, Slack, Google Drive, Figma, Google Calendar, Zapier, and Make. The docs describe no API and no self-hosted option.
Who it is for / who should skip it
Engineering leads managing cross-tool workflows and startups needing day-1 productivity without migration can use the canvas and flat pricing. Teams that require deep Jira-style reporting, complex conditional automations, or an API should skip it and keep their current stack.