AIBA
Pricing
- Free Tier
- Free Tox Scan for sample community data analysis
Summary
Most moderation stacks crack the moment your community scales past a few thousand daily messages — rules miss context, queues pile up, and your human reviewers are triaging fires instead of catching patterns. Amanda is AiBA's AI moderation platform built to hold that line before it breaks.
Amanda runs across four modules — real-time detection with automated enforcement, a case management layer where your team reviews flagged content, community trend reporting, and an audit trail for regulatory purposes. The modular design means you can deploy detection first and add the review workflow later, which shortens time to value for teams already mid-crisis. The free Tox Scan (a one-off audit against your own data, no integration required) gives you a concrete read on what your current setup is missing before you commit. Where Amanda gets constrained: the vendor page describes no API details and no self-hosted option, so teams with strict data residency requirements or who need custom upstream integrations are buying before they know the ceiling. The sales path is 'Book a Meeting' — there is no self-serve trial.
Bottom line: Amanda is a credible fit for a gaming or marketplace platform that needs AI detection plus a human review queue out of the box — but teams requiring on-premises deployment, a published API, or self-serve onboarding will hit walls before they hit production.
Community Performance Report Card
No community ratings yet. Be the first to rate this tool!
Community Benchmarks Community
Sign in to submit a benchmarkNo community benchmarks yet. Be the first to share a real-world data point.
Pros
Sign in to edit- Modular architecture lets you start with real-time detection and add case management or compliance tooling incrementally, so you avoid paying for a full platform build before you have validated what your team actually needs.
- A dedicated human review workflow sits inside the same system as automated enforcement, which means your reviewers are not context-switching between a detection tool and a separate ticket system when a call requires human judgment.
- DSA-oriented audit trail and compliance tooling is built into the platform — a paid-only feature set — so platforms under EU regulatory obligation do not need a separate compliance layer stitched onto their moderation stack.
- The Discord moderation bot covers Discord communities directly, so gaming studios and developer platforms with active Discord servers get detection without a separate integration or manual export step.
- Community trend reporting gives trust and safety leads visibility into pattern shifts across the platform, so escalating behavior gets flagged at the population level before individual incident counts become unmanageable.
Cons
Sign in to edit- No self-hosted option exists, so teams under strict data residency rules — healthcare-adjacent platforms, children's platforms in certain jurisdictions, or any organization with contractual requirements to keep community data on-premises — cannot deploy Amanda at all and will need to evaluate on-premises alternatives regardless of feature fit.
- API details are absent from public documentation; teams that need to pipe Amanda's detections into existing data warehouses, custom dashboards, or internal tooling cannot assess integration depth before entering a sales conversation, which adds weeks to any technical evaluation.
- There is no self-serve trial path beyond the one-off Tox Scan audit. Teams that need to run a proof-of-concept against live traffic — and have it complete within a sprint — face a bottleneck at the 'Book a Meeting' gate, and teams on that timeline tend to move to platforms with sandbox access instead.
Community Reviews
Sign in to write a reviewNo reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
About
- Platforms
- Online communities, Discord, games, social media, marketplaces, e-learning
- API Available
- No
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- 2026-07-13T20:23:17.598Z
Best For
Who it's for
- Online community platforms requiring scalable moderation
- Teams handling trust, safety, and regulatory compliance
- Platforms needing integration with existing tools and data
What it does well
- Real-time harmful content detection and automated enforcement
- Human-in-the-loop case management and review workflows
- Community trend analysis and moderation performance tracking
- DSA compliance and audit trail generation
- Moderation for Discord communities and multiple platform types
Discussion Community
Sign in to commentNo discussion yet. Sign in to start the conversation.
Compare AIBA
Spotted incorrect or missing data? Join our community of contributors.
Sign Up to ContributeCommunity Notes & Tips Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. General notes, observations, gotchas, and tips from people who use this tool day-to-day.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is AIBA free?
- AIBA is a paid tool. No permanent free tier is offered.
- Is AIBA open source?
- No — AIBA is a closed-source tool. Source code is not publicly available.
- What platforms does AIBA support?
- AIBA is available on: Online communities, Discord, games, social media, marketplaces, e-learning.
Hours Saved & ROI Stories Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. Concrete time/cost savings, with context. e.g. "Cut my code review backlog from 4h to 45m per week."
Curated lists that include this category
Content moderation at scale has a known failure pattern: automated rules catch the obvious violations, everything contextual slips through, and your human team inherits a queue they cannot clear. Amanda addresses this by combining AI detection with a structured case management layer. Real-time detection flags harmful content and, depending on configuration, triggers automated enforcement actions. Content that falls into gray zones routes to human reviewers through a dedicated workflow — keeping your team in the decision loop without burying them in every individual call. Trend reporting and a compliance-ready audit trail sit on top of that, so you have both operational visibility and documentation when regulators ask.
The clearest differentiating feature is the DSA compliance module. For platforms operating under the EU Digital Services Act, audit trail generation and transparency reporting are no longer optional — they are regulatory requirements with enforcement consequences. Amanda’s vendor page describes a dedicated DSA Compliance Tool alongside the audit trail module, which means platforms in scope can potentially address both their moderation workflow and their regulatory documentation from the same system rather than bolting on a separate compliance layer.
Amanda is positioned for platforms where community behavior has sector-specific context — gaming vernacular, marketplace fraud signals, children’s safety requirements, or education environments — and the vendor page explicitly calls out each of these verticals. The Discord moderation bot extends detection to Discord communities directly, making it relevant for gaming studios and developer communities running substantial activity there. What is less clear from available documentation: the specifics of API access, data residency controls, and what integration depth looks like for teams with existing data pipelines. The onboarding path is a sales call, not a sandbox — so any technical evaluation has to happen through that channel.
The free Tox Scan is the one genuinely self-serve entry point: send a sample of your community data, receive an audit of what is slipping through your current moderation, no integration and no cost. It is a useful pre-sales step, but it is not a trial of the platform itself. Migration from existing tooling is described as a managed process, with the vendor claiming to work alongside your existing policies and data.
