BoraSEO
Paid
Website owners seeking hands-off SEO
AEO Table
Freemium
Your brand vanishes from AI-generated answers and you have no way to prove it happened, let alone track when it started — because no click fires, no referrer logs, and traditional analytics never saw the loss.
$20/mo · Free tier: 50 credits, 1 active brand and 3 Tasks, Channel selection and basic reports, Watermarked share links and PDF exports · Checked Nov 3, 2026
Similar tools
BoraSEOPaidBoraSEO handles the full SEO content stack: keyword research scored by intent and difficulty…
BacklinkGPTFreemiumBacklinkGPT runs a multi-step agent that reads your site, seeds keywords, scans SERPs and…
BeaconnFreemiumBeaconn scans Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude with real buyer-intent prompts, scores…
EffectlyFreemiumEffectly connects to your CMS — WordPress, Contentful, Shopify, or GitHub — crawls your site…
Summary
AEO Table addresses that gap by running structured queries across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity, then freezing each run as an immutable snapshot so you can compare what AI channels said last month against what they say now. The core loop is four steps: define your brand, scope a task with target questions and competitors, trigger a run, and pull a report with citations intact. It works well for teams that need repeatable evidence — share-of-answer metrics, competitor appearances, and the source domains driving citations. The ceiling arrives fast for teams that need to act on that evidence programmatically: there is no API, no webhook, and no way to pipe results into your existing data stack without manual export.
Bottom line: Pick this when a marketing or SEO team needs to show stakeholders that a competitor is eating AI answer share — and plan around it when your data team asks to automate the ingestion.
Pricing Plans
SubscriptionLast verified 3 days ago- Price
- $20/mo
- Free Tier
- 50 credits, 1 active brand and 3 Tasks, Channel selection and basic reports, Watermarked share links and PDF exports
VALIDATE THE WORKFLOW
Free
Use the core AEO Table workflow before connecting paid billing. One-time launch grant.
- 50 credits
- 100 launch credits
- 1 active brand and 3 Tasks
- Channel selection and basic reports
- Watermarked share links and PDF exports
Grow
$20per month
For operators ready to run recurring AI search visibility checks. Most Popular.
- 1,000 credits per month
- 2,000 launch credits per month
- 3 active brands and 10 Tasks per brand
- Scheduled monitoring and historical report trends
- Full report evidence and citation depth
Scale 5X
$100per month
For running more queries, channels, and ongoing monitoring cycles.
- 5,000 credits per month
- 10,000 launch credits per month
- 10 active brands and unlimited Tasks per brand
- Higher-volume recurring Runs across channels
- More room for multi-channel analysis
Enterprise
Custom
For larger programs that need custom limits, onboarding, and support.
- Custom credit allocation
- Launch and migration support
- Security and procurement workflow support
View full pricing on aeotable.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Find your fit
Before you choose AEO Table
More options in SEO Tools. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
BacklinkGPT
Freemium
SEOs and agencies managing link building
Pros
- Immutable Run snapshots freeze the exact question set, providers, and competitor scope alongside the answer evidence, so month-over-month comparisons don't silently shift when AI models update — which means you can defend 'visibility dropped in March' with a timestamped record rather than a hunch.
- Citation-level evidence shows which source domains AI channels are pulling from when they mention or skip your brand, so content and SEO teams can prioritize which third-party placements actually drive AI visibility instead of optimizing in the dark.
- Cross-provider coverage across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity in a single task run, so you avoid maintaining three separate manual query logs to get a consolidated picture of where your brand stands in AI-generated answers.
- Public share links and PDF export let account managers deliver polished visibility reports to clients or executives without requiring stakeholders to log in, which removes the friction that normally turns good data into a slide that never gets acted on.
- Multi-brand and multi-task structure means an agency managing ten clients can scope each monitoring job independently — separate question sets, competitor lists, and markets — without runs from one client contaminating the evidence for another.
Cons
- There is no API and no webhook, so every run result lives inside the platform until someone manually exports it. Teams that need AI visibility data joined to a BI dashboard, CRM, or performance report have no automated path — they copy, paste, or download PDFs. When that friction compounds across weekly runs for multiple clients, the manual overhead becomes the bottleneck.
- The credit-based model caps how many queries you can run on the free tier, and the docs describe the free allocation as a one-time launch grant rather than a recurring allowance. Teams that want daily or high-frequency monitoring hit the credit ceiling and must move to a paid tier — at which point they are evaluating cost per run against building their own query layer on top of provider APIs.
- Monitoring is limited to ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity. Teams that need visibility into Bing Copilot, Claude, Gemini, or regional AI answer surfaces have no coverage here. When a client's target market skews toward a provider not on the list, the platform's evidence set is structurally incomplete — and teams in that position move toward custom monitoring solutions that can target arbitrary endpoints.
About
- Platforms
- Web-based SaaS
- API Available
- No
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- June 10, 2026
Best For
Who it's for
- Marketing and brand teams
- SEO professionals tracking AI search
- Agencies managing multiple clients
- Companies monitoring competitive AI visibility
- Brand operators needing recurring visibility checks
What it does well
- Track brand mentions across AI search engines
- Monitor how AI systems cite your content vs. competitors
- Measure AI search visibility trends over time
- Generate shareable reports on AI visibility
- Manage multiple brands and monitoring tasks
Integrations
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is AEO Table free?
- AEO Table offers a free option alongside paid upgrades. Pricing: $20/mo. Check the current allowances and terms before choosing a plan.
- What platforms does AEO Table support?
- AEO Table is available on: Web-based SaaS.
Curated lists that include this category
Most analytics stacks record clicks that never happened because an AI answer recommended a competitor and the buyer stopped there. AEO Table monitors that blind spot by querying ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, and Perplexity with the buyer questions you define, then capturing brand mentions, competitor appearances, and cited source domains in a frozen snapshot the vendor calls a Run. The workflow is deliberately scoped: you set up a Brand, create a Task that fixes the question set, market, and competitor list, trigger a Run, and review the resulting report — which includes an executive summary, provider-level breakdowns, and citation evidence. PDF export and public share links let you hand findings to stakeholders without granting platform access.
The differentiating design choice is immutability. Each Run preserves the exact inputs — questions, providers, competitor set — alongside the answer evidence, so reports function as a historical record of what AI channels actually said rather than a live dashboard that silently updates. That makes it defensible for client reporting or internal escalations where ‘things changed’ is not a sufficient explanation.
For brand and SEO teams running periodic audits or agency practitioners managing multiple clients, the task-and-run model maps cleanly onto a monthly or weekly cadence. The tool breaks down when a team needs continuous monitoring with alerts, wants to join AI visibility data to CRM or BI tooling, or needs to run queries at a volume that exceeds the credit allowance on the free tier. There is no API to automate runs or export data programmatically, which means any workflow beyond manual review requires copy-paste or PDF extraction. Teams with engineering capacity who hit that wall tend to move toward building custom query pipelines against provider APIs directly.
Infrastructure is U.S.-hosted by default, and the vendor states that hosting, database, and AI routing use SOC 2 audited providers — relevant for teams in regulated industries where data residency is a compliance checkbox rather than a nice-to-have.
Contribute
- Work on AEO Table? Claim this listing.
- Embed a badge for your README or site.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.