Cotypist vs Grammarly AI
They help at different moments. Cotypist is autocomplete for your Mac: it predicts the next few words in any app and you press Tab to take them, with the model running on the machine. Grammarly checks and rewrites what you've already written (grammar, tone, clarity) and works on Windows, Mac, browsers and phones. Some people run both.
If you're not on an Apple Silicon Mac
Then it's Grammarly. Cotypist only runs on Apple Silicon Macs, with no Windows or Linux version yet. Grammarly lists desktop apps for Windows and Mac, extensions for Chrome, Safari, Firefox and Edge, add-ins for Microsoft Office and Google Docs, and iPhone, iPad and Android apps. The Grammarly site footer now reads Superhuman Platform, and Enterprise is sold through Superhuman Go.
Privacy and what runs where
Cotypist's FAQ says suggestions are generated entirely on the Mac, work offline, and nothing is processed or logged in the cloud. That's the main reason to choose it for confidential writing. It also lets you set writing instructions, and on Pro, separate instructions per app, so Slack replies and client emails can sound different.
Grammarly's strength is the second pass: catching mistakes, adjusting tone, rewriting whole sentences, and on Pro, plagiarism and AI-text detection. It's the better tool when the problem is correctness rather than typing speed.
Price for one person
Cotypist Free gives 100 accepted words a day. Plus is $6 a month ($72 a year) for unlimited completions on one Mac; Pro is $9 a month ($108 a year) for up to three of your own Macs, all models and per-app instructions. Every new install gets 30 days of Pro with no card.
Grammarly Free includes 100 AI prompts a month on top of basic grammar and spelling. Pro is shown at $12 a month with a free trial and 2,000 AI prompts per member. Enterprise is custom-priced with unlimited prompts.
Cotypist: Pick Cotypist if you write all day on an Apple Silicon Mac and want faster typing with suggestions that never leave the machine.
Grammarly AI: Pick Grammarly if you want mistakes and tone fixed across Windows, Mac, your browser and your phone.
Facts checked Oct 18, 2026 against 2 sources
Which one should you try?
Pricing, capabilities and platforms side by side. Prices are as of the "Pricing checked" date in the table.

Cotypist
Cotypist sits in the macOS menu bar and surfaces word-completion suggestions as you type, accepted with a Tab keystroke, across whichever apps you have open. The differentiating mechanic is per-app instruction profiles: you teach it one voice for client emails, a different register for pull-request descriptions, and it holds those rules separately per application. On-device processing keeps your keystrokes off external servers. The free tier caps daily output at 100 words — a ceiling that arrives fast for anyone with real writing volume. No API, no Windows build, no self-hosting path exists.

Grammarly AI
Grammarly sits in your browser and writing apps, flagging mistakes as you type—grammar, spelling, tone, clarity. It's useful if you write emails, documents, or social posts and want a second pair of eyes without leaving your workflow. The free tier covers basics; Premium ($12/month) adds tone detection and advanced rewrites. The catch: the free version is genuinely limited, and Premium's AI-powered suggestions sometimes miss context or feel prescriptive. It works best for high-stakes writing where accuracy matters more than speed.
| Attribute | Cotypist | Grammarly AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price | $6/mo or $9/mo | Pro $12/mo billed annually ($144/yr) or $30 month to month |
| Pricing checked | Jun 11, 2026 | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Free trial | 30 days | Not stated |
| Open source | No | No |
| Has API | No | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | No | No |
| Platforms | macOS (Apple Silicon only) | Windows, Mac, browser extensions (Chrome, Safari, Firefox, Edge), Microsoft Office, Google Docs, iPhone, iPad, Android |
| Languages | — | 95+ languages |
| Released | — | 2009 |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Made up your mind?
Specs come from each tool's own site and docs (how we test). AIDiveForge is editorially independent.