Get This Tool
VibeRaven
Summary
AI coding agents build convincing demos before the production wiring is done — auth routes look complete until a real user hits a callback that was never registered, or a webhook fires without signature verification. VibeRaven exists to close that gap before launch, not after.
VibeRaven scans a repo against a production-readiness checklist covering auth boundaries, billing flows, database migration state, deployment config, and monitoring — then generates a focused prompt for the next coding-agent session based on the specific evidence gaps it finds. The distinction it enforces is useful: changes the agent can make in the repo versus dashboard actions that require a human to touch Stripe, Vercel, Supabase, or Clerk directly. The docs describe a freemium hosted scanning interface with a free scan limit, plus an npx CLI path for local runs. Where it breaks is scope — VibeRaven reads repo evidence and provider configuration signals, but it does not run your app or simulate live traffic, so gaps that only appear under real request conditions are outside its detection range.
Bottom line: Use it to audit an AI-built app before the first real user touches it; expect to pair it with actual integration tests when your billing or auth flows need runtime verification, not just static evidence.
Pricing Plans
SubscriptionLast verified 2 weeks ago- Price
- $9.99/month
- Free Tier
- 2 app checks, core production areas checked
Free
Try VibeRaven on one real AI-built app before launch.
- 2 app checks
- Core production areas checked
- Next fix for your coding agent
- Visual extension report included
Pro
Keep checking your app as your AI agent keeps changing code. BEST FOR SHIPPING
- 50 app checks every month
- All production areas checked
- Next fix plus verify before deploy
- Visual extension report included
View full pricing on viberaven.dev →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Community Performance Report Card
No community ratings yet. Be the first to rate this tool!
Community Benchmarks Community
Sign in to submit a benchmarkNo community benchmarks yet. Be the first to share a real-world data point.
Pros
Sign in to edit- Scans auth boundaries, protected routes, and server-side authorization in one pass, so you catch an unprotected API handler before a real user does rather than during an incident postmortem.
- Separates repo-fixable gaps from provider dashboard actions the agent cannot touch, so the agent stops wasting a session editing code when the actual problem is an unregistered Stripe webhook URL.
- Generates a focused, evidence-based prompt for the next coding-agent session, so the agent's next run targets a specific file or missing check instead of re-reviewing everything it already touched.
- MIT-licensed CLI distributed via npx with a self-hosted option, so teams with data residency requirements or scan-volume needs above the hosted free tier are not locked into the cloud interface.
- Tracks what changed between releases and which provider context matters before the next patch, so version-to-version drift in environment variable separation or live/test key configuration surfaces before it ships.
Cons
Sign in to edit- Static repo scanning finds missing code evidence but does not execute the app or simulate requests, so auth flows that look correct in the file tree but fail at runtime under real OAuth callbacks or signed webhook payloads are outside its detection range — teams doing payment or identity integration still need live integration tests.
- The free tier on the hosted scanner carries a scan limit; teams running frequent iterative agent sessions against the same repo will hit that ceiling and face a choice between self-hosting the CLI or moving to a paid-only hosted tier — the CLI setup adds a maintenance surface most teams did not budget for.
- Provider coverage maps to Supabase, Vercel, Stripe, and Clerk; teams on different infrastructure stacks — AWS Cognito for auth, custom payment processors, or non-Vercel deployment targets — get weaker signal from the checklist, and at that point a custom pre-launch checklist or a purpose-built security scanner for the actual stack becomes more reliable.
Community Reviews
Sign in to write a reviewNo reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
About
- Platforms
- CLI, npm, local install
- API Available
- No
- Self-Hosted
- Yes
- Last Updated
- 2026-06-30T12:36:27.683Z
Best For
Who it's for
- Developers using AI coding agents like Claude Code or Cursor
- Teams shipping AI-built apps to production
- Projects involving Supabase, Vercel, Stripe, or Clerk
- Maintaining release and version context during iterative agent work
What it does well
- Scanning a repo after AI agent coding sessions to identify launch risks
- Generating focused prompts for coding agents based on evidence gaps
- Reviewing releases for provider configuration drift and authorization issues
- Separating repo fixes from manual provider dashboard actions
Integrations
Discussion Community
Sign in to commentNo discussion yet. Sign in to start the conversation.
Compare VibeRaven
Spotted incorrect or missing data? Join our community of contributors.
Sign Up to ContributeCommunity Notes & Tips Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. General notes, observations, gotchas, and tips from people who use this tool day-to-day.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is VibeRaven free?
- VibeRaven has a permanent free tier alongside paid upgrades (paid plans from $9.99/month). You can keep using a baseline version indefinitely without paying.
- Is VibeRaven open source?
- Yes. VibeRaven is open source.
- Can I self-host VibeRaven?
- Yes. VibeRaven supports self-hosting on your own infrastructure.
- What platforms does VibeRaven support?
- VibeRaven is available on: CLI, npm, local install.
Hours Saved & ROI Stories Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. Concrete time/cost savings, with context. e.g. "Cut my code review backlog from 4h to 45m per week."
Curated lists that include this category
AI coding tools ship plausible-looking code before production systems are fully wired. VibeRaven scans the repo for evidence of production readiness across five domains — auth and authorization, billing and webhook verification, database migrations and row-level security, deployment configuration, and monitoring — then produces a short list of evidenced gaps, the files or provider settings involved, and a narrow, copy-ready prompt for the next coding-agent session. The workflow is scan, read the gap map, decide which fixes go to the agent and which require a provider dashboard action, then re-scan after the next session.
The feature that separates VibeRaven from a generic linter or code-review checklist is the repo-to-dashboard boundary. The vendor page explicitly distinguishes changes an agent can make in the codebase from provider-side actions — registering callback URLs in Clerk, flipping Stripe to live-mode keys, confirming Vercel environment variable separation — that no coding agent can resolve by editing files. That distinction prevents the failure mode where an agent patches the code correctly but the provider configuration is still pointed at a test environment.
VibeRaven fits teams shipping AI-built apps that use common provider stacks — Supabase, Vercel, Stripe, Clerk — and who run iterative agent sessions where context about what changed between releases matters. It is distributed as an npx CLI (MIT license, confirmed via GitHub) and as a hosted scanner at viberaven.dev with a free scan limit on the hosted tier. Where it does not fit: teams that need runtime behavior verified, load-tested, or integration-tested against live provider responses will hit the ceiling of static repo scanning quickly. The tool finds missing evidence in the codebase; it does not execute code or confirm that a webhook actually fires and validates correctly under production conditions.
The MCP loop and multi-step workflow design mean VibeRaven can be wired into an agent’s own toolchain so the agent queries it before proposing a broad patch — the vendor page describes this as the tool giving the builder a launch map so the next session targets one evidenced gap instead of a vague ‘make everything production ready’ request.