Social Claw
Summary
Every social scheduling tool handles a single queue fine — the gap appears when you want an AI agent to pick the posting time, write the copy, and hit publish without you touching a dashboard.
SocialClaw is built as a publishing layer for agents, not just a scheduler with an API bolted on. The vendor describes 18 MCP tools for Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor, a CLI for posting from a terminal or CI pipeline, and an OpenClaw skill you install into your own agent. Eleven networks are supported, and media generation — video, voice, images — sits inside the same workspace so the agent does not need to reach outside for assets. The analytics layer is present but sparse in documentation detail, and because there is no self-hosted option, your agent's posting cadence depends on SocialClaw's uptime.
Bottom line: Pick this when you are wiring Claude or Codex into a publishing workflow and need a single API that covers scheduling, copy, and media generation — but plan around the vendor lock-in before you route a high-volume production pipeline through a hosted-only service.
Pricing Plans
Subscription- Free Tier
- 7-day free trial on Starter plan (3 accounts, 200 posts/month thereafter paid)
Starter
3 accounts · 200 posts / month after 7-day free trial
- CLI & agent skills
- Hosted workspace
- API
- Media storage included
Startup
6 accounts · 400 posts / month
- CLI & agent skills
- Hosted workspace
- API
- Media storage included
Plus
20 accounts · 1,000 posts / month (most popular)
- CLI & agent skills
- Hosted workspace
- API
- Media storage included
Pro
50 accounts · 2,500 posts / month
- CLI & agent skills
- Hosted workspace
- API
- Media storage included
View full pricing on getsocialclaw.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Community Performance Report Card
No community ratings yet. Be the first to rate this tool!
Community Benchmarks Community
Sign in to submit a benchmarkNo community benchmarks yet. Be the first to share a real-world data point.
Pros
Sign in to edit- 18 MCP tools for Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor, so an agent already running in those environments can schedule and publish without bridging to a separate interface — which means you avoid building and maintaining a custom API wrapper.
- CLI and npm-installable skill support posting from a terminal or CI pipeline, so publishing steps slot into existing deployment workflows rather than requiring a separate browser session.
- Media generation — video, voice, and images — lives inside the same workspace as scheduling, so an agent building a post does not need to chain in a separate media service and manage cross-tool auth.
- Eleven supported networks under one API and one schedule, which means a multi-platform posting workflow does not require separate integrations per network or separate rate-limit handling per platform.
- Repeatable posting workflows at the workflow layer mean a posting routine can be defined once and triggered by an agent or a CI event, rather than reconstructed each time a human logs in.
Cons
Sign in to edit- No self-hosted option exists: if SocialClaw's infrastructure goes down during a scheduled campaign or a CI-triggered posting run, your agent has nowhere to route the request — teams with uptime SLAs or regulated content pipelines will need a fallback architecture or a different tool entirely.
- Analytics coverage is described only as 'reach and engagement per account' — teams that need attribution depth, historical export, or cross-platform reporting will hit that ceiling quickly and end up running a second analytics tool in parallel, which erodes the single-workspace argument.
- The approval and account management layer is listed as a feature but carries no detail in the vendor documentation about role granularity, audit logging, or workflow customization — teams managing multiple clients or requiring sign-off trails before posts go live will find the gap and likely move to a tool like Buffer or Hootsuite that has a documented, mature approval flow.
Community Reviews
Sign in to write a reviewNo reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
About
- Platforms
- Instagram, TikTok, X, LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, Discord, Telegram, WordPress, Pinterest, Snapchat
- API Available
- Yes
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- 2026-07-25T08:01:14.636Z
Best For
Who it's for
- Marketing teams handling multi-platform posting
- Users needing media generation alongside scheduling
- Developers using Claude, Cursor, or CLI tools
What it does well
- Scheduling posts across multiple networks via AI agents
- Generating and publishing UGC promo videos
- Managing social accounts and approvals in one workspace
- Running repeatable posting workflows
- Integrating social publishing into code or CI pipelines
Integrations
Discussion Community
Sign in to commentNo discussion yet. Sign in to start the conversation.
Compare Social Claw
Spotted incorrect or missing data? Join our community of contributors.
Sign Up to ContributeCommunity Notes & Tips Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. General notes, observations, gotchas, and tips from people who use this tool day-to-day.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is Social Claw free?
- Social Claw has a permanent free tier alongside paid upgrades. You can keep using a baseline version indefinitely without paying.
- Is Social Claw open source?
- No — Social Claw is a closed-source tool. Source code is not publicly available.
- Does Social Claw have an API?
- Yes. Social Claw exposes a developer API. See the official documentation at https://getsocialclaw.com for details.
- What platforms does Social Claw support?
- Social Claw is available on: Instagram, TikTok, X, LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, Discord, Telegram, WordPress, Pinterest, Snapchat.
Hours Saved & ROI Stories Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. Concrete time/cost savings, with context. e.g. "Cut my code review backlog from 4h to 45m per week."
Best Social Claw alternatives →
Curated lists that include this category
Most social schedulers assume a human is clicking the publish button. SocialClaw is built around the opposite assumption: that the thing deciding what to post, when to post it, and what media to attach is an agent. The core workflow runs from content generation — UGC promo video from a screen recording, captions, images — through an AI scheduler that selects posting slots, then out to eleven platforms including Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube, Reddit, Discord, and Telegram, all managed from one workspace with account and approval controls.
The differentiating feature is the MCP integration layer. The vendor describes 18 MCP tools accessible to Claude Desktop, Claude Code, ChatGPT via a hosted MCP server, and Cursor — so an agent already running in one of those environments can schedule and publish without leaving its native context. There is also a CLI installable via npm and an OpenClaw skill designed for custom agent frameworks, which means the publishing surface is reachable from a terminal, a CI job, or an arbitrary agent runtime, not just through a browser.
This fits cleanly when the build is agent-first: a developer wiring Claude or Codex to manage a brand’s posting cadence, or a marketing team that wants repeatable posting workflows triggered by code rather than calendar clicks. The seams show when the team needs to audit or override at scale — the approvals layer exists, but the docs describe it briefly, and there is no self-hosted option, so teams running regulated content or high-volume pipelines carry a dependency on SocialClaw’s infrastructure availability. Analytics covers reach and engagement per account but the vendor page gives no detail on export, attribution depth, or historical range.
The npm install path (`npm install -g socialclaw`) and the `npx skills add ndesv21/socialclaw` command for agent skill injection suggest the intended user is already comfortable in a terminal. REST API access lets teams validate and apply schedules programmatically, which makes the tool composable with existing CI/CD infrastructure — though the API documentation depth is not described in detail on the vendor page.