Make This Better
Summary
A user says 'it doesn't work,' your agent has nothing to go on, and the bug sits unresolved until someone from your team can reproduce it manually — which on a solo-dev or AI-first team might be never. Make This Better drops a feedback widget into your product that captures the URL, screenshot, DOM snapshot, and console log at the moment the user hits the wall, then hands that evidence directly to your coding agent.
The workflow has four steps: user clicks a feedback button, marks up the element causing grief, and submits; AI asks one or two clarifying questions and extracts context, blocker, and underlying need into a structured ticket; the developer or agent runs `/makethisbetter pick` via MCP to claim the issue and inspect the raw evidence; the user watches their ticket move from received to shipped on a public board. The MCP integration works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and Codex. The tool does not run agents itself — it feeds structured data and status commands to agents you already have. Teams without that agent setup get a well-organized feedback board, but the automated fix loop does not exist without the external agent doing the work.
Bottom line: Pick this when you are shipping with an AI coding assistant and have no QA staff to triage bug reports — the structured evidence it hands your agent is what turns 'it doesn't work' into a merged PR; skip it if your workflow does not include an MCP-compatible coding agent, because the triage data lands on a board with no one to act on it automatically.
Pricing Plans
Subscription- Price
- $0 Free; $15.9/mo Pro; $39.9/mo Team
- Free Tier
- 1 seat, 30-day history, public board on subdomain
Free
1 seat, unlimited projects, 30-day history, public board
- 1 seat
- Unlimited projects
- 30-day history
- Public board on subdomain
- BYOK
Pro
3 seats, 1-year history, private boards, custom domain, no branding
- 3 seats
- 1-year history
- Private boards
- Custom domain
- No branding
- Third-party integrations
Team
10 seats, all Pro features plus collaboration and roles
- 10 seats
- All Pro features
- Team collaboration and roles
View full pricing on makethisbetter.dev →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Community Performance Report Card
No community ratings yet. Be the first to rate this tool!
Pros
Sign in to edit- Auto-captures screenshot, DOM snapshot, and console log at the moment of user report, so your agent gets reproduction evidence instead of a vague complaint — without this, reproducing the bug requires back-and-forth that solo and AI-first teams rarely have time for.
- AI triage structures every report into scene, blocker, and underlying need before it reaches your board, which means your agent picks up a ticket it can act on rather than raw text it has to interpret.
- MCP integration with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and Codex means the agent claims the ticket and inspects evidence without leaving the editor — removing the manual handoff between feedback tool and coding environment that breaks async fix loops.
- Public Feedback Board shows users their ticket moving from received to shipped in real time, so users who hit a bug see it acknowledged and resolved rather than disappearing into silence — the vendor frames this directly as churn prevention.
- Feedback grouping clusters related reports into single issues for prioritization, so a bug hit by twenty users does not generate twenty separate tickets demanding individual triage.
Cons
Sign in to edit- The agent-driven fix loop — the core pitch — does not function unless the team is already running an MCP-compatible coding agent like Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, or Codex; teams without that setup get a structured feedback board, which competing tools like Canny or Linear also provide with more mature roadmap and prioritization features, making this the condition under which teams abandon it for a category-standard alternative.
- No API is available, which means teams that want to pipe feedback data into their own data warehouse, webhook pipeline, or internal tooling hit a dead end; the only integration path is the MCP server the vendor provides.
- No self-hosted option exists, so teams with data residency requirements or security policies that prohibit third-party SaaS receiving DOM snapshots and console logs — which can contain sensitive application state — cannot use the tool in its current form.
- History and private boards are paid-only features, which means teams on the free tier have limited access to longitudinal feedback data — the kind of trend analysis that justifies prioritization decisions accumulates behind a paywall as the product scales.
About
- Platforms
- Web widget, CLI, MCP server
- API Available
- No
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- 2026-08-16T10:34:48.033Z
Best For
Who it's for
- Teams shipping with AI coding assistants
- Products lacking dedicated support or QA staff
- Developers who want user-reported bugs routed directly to their agent workflow
What it does well
- Capturing reproduction details from users without QA teams
- Turning vague 'it doesn't work' reports into actionable agent tasks
- Grouping related feedback into single issues for prioritization
Integrations
Add notes, reviews, and benchmarks so the next visitor gets a clearer picture.
Compare Make This Better
Spotted incorrect or missing data? Join our community of contributors.
Sign Up to ContributeFrequently Asked Questions
- Is Make This Better free?
- Make This Better has a permanent free tier alongside paid upgrades (paid plans from $0 Free; $15.9/mo Pro; $39.9/mo Team). You can keep using a baseline version indefinitely without paying.
- Is Make This Better open source?
- No — Make This Better is a closed-source tool. Source code is not publicly available.
- What platforms does Make This Better support?
- Make This Better is available on: Web widget, CLI, MCP server.
Best Make This Better alternatives →
Curated lists that include this category
The problem with vague bug reports
A user says ‘it doesn’t work,’ your agent has nothing to go on, and the bug sits unresolved until someone from your team can reproduce it manually — which on a solo-dev or AI-first team might be never. Make This Better drops a feedback widget into your product that captures the URL, screenshot, DOM snapshot, and console log at the moment the user hits the wall, then hands that evidence directly to your coding agent.
How it works
The workflow has four steps: user clicks a feedback button, marks up the element causing grief, and submits; AI asks one or two clarifying questions and extracts context, blocker, and underlying need into a structured ticket; the developer or agent runs `/makethisbetter pick` via MCP to claim the issue and inspect the raw evidence; the user watches their ticket move from received to shipped on a public board. The MCP integration works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and Codex. The tool does not run agents itself — it feeds structured data and status commands to agents you already have.
Pricing
Free at $0 with 1 seat, 30-day history, and public board on subdomain. Pro costs $15.9/mo and Team costs $39.9/mo on a subscription model.
Who it is for / who should skip it
Best for teams shipping with AI coding assistants, products lacking dedicated support or QA staff, and developers who want user-reported bugs routed directly to their agent workflow. Use cases include capturing reproduction details from users without QA teams, turning vague reports into actionable agent tasks, and grouping related feedback into single issues. Teams without an MCP-compatible coding agent get only a structured feedback board that competing tools provide with more mature features. No API is available.