Cadenya
Freemium
Developers building agentic workflows
Agent deployments that work fine at ten requests per day start producing silent failures at scale — wrong branches taken, tools called in the wrong order, outputs that look plausible but aren't — and your traces give you no actionable path back to the code that caused it. HALO is built to close that gap.
HALO is an open-source Hierarchical Agent Loop Optimizer that ingests production execution traces and generates RLM (Reinforcement Learning from Mistakes) reports pointing at the specific harness code responsible for systemic failures. The core loop is: run your agents, collect traces, feed them to HALO, receive a structured critique, patch the harness. It installs as a desktop app via a one-line curl command or as a hosted option through inference.net. The tool is built around planning and execution trace analysis, so it rewards teams who already instrument their agents — if your traces are thin, the reports will be too. Teams with dense trace data get targeted code-level feedback; teams without it get generic signal.
Bottom line: Pick HALO when you have a high-traffic agent deployment generating real traces and you need something that turns those traces into harness fixes — not when your agents are still in prototype and you have no production signal to feed it.
Find your fit
More options in Agent Frameworks. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Freemium
Developers building agentic workflows
Free · Open source
Long-term continuity in multi-session coding projects
Most agent debugging tools stop at showing you what happened. HALO is designed to tell you what to change. It takes production execution traces from running agent harnesses, runs them through an RLM-based analysis engine, and produces reports that identify systemic failure patterns — not one-off errors, but recurring breakdowns in planning or execution sequences. The workflow is trace-in, critique-out: your agents run, HALO analyzes the trace corpus, and you get a report you can act on in the next sprint.
The differentiating mechanism is the RLM (Reinforcement Learning from Mistakes) report layer. Rather than simply surfacing where an agent failed, the docs describe an approach that reconstructs the decision path and attributes failures to specific harness components — planning logic, skill invocations, or execution branching. This is the feature that separates HALO from generic observability dashboards: it closes the loop from trace observation back to code change.
HALO fits teams who are past the prototype stage and running agents under real load. It installs via a signed, notarized desktop app on macOS, with a GitHub releases path for other platforms, and a hosted option is available through inference.net for teams who do not want to self-manage. There is no API surface exposed, which means HALO does not slot into an existing pipeline as a callable service — it is a development and optimization tool you run against your traces, not a runtime component. Teams expecting to trigger HALO programmatically as part of a CI step will hit that wall immediately.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.