Skip to main content
AIDiveForge AIDiveForge

Grok Code Fast 1 vs o1

Which one should you try?

Grok Code Fast 1

Freemium

Best for <cite index="1-4">Agentic coding workflows requiring fast loops of reasoning and tool calls</cite>

o1

Freemium

Best for Research and academic applications

Pricing, capabilities and platforms side by side. Prices are as of the "Pricing checked" date in the table.

Grok Code Fast 1

Grok Code Fast 1

<cite index="2-1">Released in late August 2025, the xAI Grok Code Fast 1 model is a coding-focused AI model that excels at common, high-volume coding task and is designed especially for agentic coding workflows.</cite> <cite index="1-6,1-7,1-8">Built from scratch with a brand-new model architecture, it was trained on a pre-training corpus rich with programming-related content, and curated high-quality datasets that reflect real-world pull requests and coding tasks.</cite> <cite index="1-23">The model is particularly adept at TypeScript, Python, Java, Rust, C++, and Go.</cite> <cite index="1-13">The model is generally available via the xAI API, priced at $0.20 / 1M input tokens, $1.50 / 1M output tokens, and $0.02 / 1M cached input tokens.</cite>

o1

o1

o1 is built around a single insight: some problems need deliberate, multi-step reasoning rather than pattern matching at scale. Before generating an answer, the model works through logic chains internally—visible to you—on math proofs, bug-heavy code, and scientific questions where a wrong answer is worse than a slow one. It costs roughly 2–3x more per token than GPT-4o and takes longer to respond, making it a specialist tool rather than a daily driver. The real catch is knowing when you actually need it; using o1 for a summarization task or casual question is like hiring a surgeon to tie your shoes.

AttributeGrok Code Fast 1o1
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Price$30/month$15/1M input tokens, $60/1M output tokens (API); also available via ChatGPT Plus ($20/mo)
Pricing checkedJun 11, 2026Nov 3, 2026
Free trial0 daysNot stated
Open sourceNoNo
Has APIYesYes
Self-hosted optionNoNo
Platforms<cite index="30-1">Available through xAI API and integrated with launch partners including GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code, Kilo Code, opencode, and Windsurf</cite>Web, API
Languages<cite index="1-23">TypeScript, Python, Java, Rust, C++, and Go</cite>English, multilingual support
Released2025-08-282024-12
Pros
  • <cite index="2-25,2-26">Massive throughput of approximately 90-100 tokens per second, delivering dozens of tool calls and edits before you finish reading its initial plan in IDE integrations</cite>
  • <cite index="1-13">Economical pricing at $0.20/1M input tokens and $1.50/1M output tokens</cite>
  • <cite index="2-27,2-28,2-29">Visible reasoning traces that provide real-time, summarized view of its reasoning process, helping developers catch logic errors early</cite>
  • <cite index="1-22">Prompt caching optimizations regularly achieving cache hit rates above 90% when used with launch partners</cite>
  • Superior reasoning capability on complex problems
  • State-of-the-art performance on STEM benchmarks
  • Transparent reasoning process for verification
  • Robust handling of multi-step logical inference
  • Strong code generation and technical reasoning
Cons
  • <cite index="6-31,6-34">Potential gaps in training on specific frameworks; poor performance on Tailwind CSS v3 tasks, suggesting possible smaller model size limitations</cite>
  • <cite index="6-36">Its reasoning model nature makes it unsuitable for interactive workflows requiring fast responses despite fast token throughput</cite>
  • Slower inference time than standard LLMs due to reasoning overhead
  • Higher per-token cost reflects computational complexity
  • Optimized for reasoning tasks; may be overkill for simple queries

Made up your mind?

Grok Code Fast 1

Freemium

Best for <cite index="1-4">Agentic coding workflows requiring fast loops of reasoning and tool calls</cite>

o1

Freemium

Best for Research and academic applications

Specs come from each tool's own site and docs (how we test). AIDiveForge is editorially independent.

Share this comparison