Cursor vs OpenCode
Cursor has a free plan plus paid upgrades, while OpenCode is free. OpenCode is open source and Cursor is not. You can run OpenCode on your own machine or server; Cursor is hosted by the vendor.
Which one should you try?
Cursor
FreemiumBest for Developers who want an agent to plan and edit across a codebase
OpenCode
FreeBest for Developers who want an open-source coding agent in the terminal
Pricing, capabilities and platforms side by side. Prices are as of the "Pricing checked" date in the table.

Cursor
AI code editor, CLI and cloud agents. Free plan; Plus $8/month uses Grok only; third-party model use starts with Premium.

OpenCode
OpenCode is an MIT-licensed AI coding agent for the terminal that works with the model provider you choose, including local models. We installed it and ran three agent tasks: 9 of 9 passed with Claude Opus 5.5, 3 of 9 with a 3B local model.
| Attribute | Cursor | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| Price | Free; Plus $8/month (Grok models only); Premium $30/month plus third-party model usage; Teams from $30/user/month | Free (MIT). Optional Zen models pay as you go; Go $10/mo, Go Plus $40/mo |
| Pricing checked | Oct 17, 2026 | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Has API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Desktop app (macOS, Windows, Linux), CLI, cloud agents, Slack, GitHub | Terminal, Desktop (beta macOS/Windows/Linux), IDE extension |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Made up your mind?
Cursor
FreemiumBest for Developers who want an agent to plan and edit across a codebase
OpenCode
FreeBest for Developers who want an open-source coding agent in the terminal
Specs come from each tool's own site and docs (how we test). AIDiveForge is editorially independent.