Literature Map Builder
Organize supplied papers into an evidence-based topic map.
Get clusters, paper-level evidence and clearly labeled research questions.
Free · 2 KB · SKILL.md, instructions and example files. Provide paper texts or abstracts with stable identifiers.
A worked example
A small example to try before using your own data.
Input
{
"papers": [
{
"id": "A",
"method": "retrieval",
"finding": "better factuality on short answers"
},
{
"id": "B",
"method": "retrieval",
"finding": "no gain on long answers"
},
{
"id": "C",
"method": "human review",
"finding": "catches citation errors"
}
]
}Expected result
Cluster 1: retrieval, A/B; results vary with answer length. Cluster 2: human review, C. Question suggested by this corpus: does combined retrieval and review help long answers? Search beyond these three papers before claiming a literature gap.
What to check: Keep the A/B disagreement and scope every gap claim to the supplied corpus.
Limits: Coverage depends on the papers provided. The output is not a systematic review unless a systematic search was actually performed.
Worked example included. Model-specific performance and vendor compatibility have not been benchmarked.
🧠 Why it works
Keep the A/B disagreement and scope every gap claim to the supplied corpus.
⚙️ How it works
- Record each paper’s question, method, dataset, result and stated limitations.
- Cluster by the research question and method rather than title keywords alone.
- Keep paper identifiers on every cluster summary and identify contradictory results.
- Describe apparent gaps as questions within this supplied corpus, not proof that no research exists.
- Return the map, an evidence table and targeted searches that could test the proposed gaps.
Description
Get clusters, paper-level evidence and clearly labeled research questions.
Provide paper texts or abstracts with stable identifiers.
Limits: Coverage depends on the papers provided. The output is not a systematic review unless a systematic search was actually performed.
Recommended Use
Sign in to suggestTools and workflow packs this skill pairs well with. Forge picks are auto-generated from category + capability signals; Community picks are added by people who've used the pairing.
No matches yet. Be the first to suggest a pairing, or the Forge will populate suggestions as signals align.
Report compatibility
Tell the community which tool you used this skill with, and whether it worked.
Suggest a pairing
Recommend a tool or workflow pack that this skill works well with. Up to 5 recommendations per day.