Epismo OS
Freemium
Teams using multiple AI tools on the same tasks
TryPromptFlow
Freemium
A workflow breaks in production and the failure report you get is 'it stopped working' — no log excerpt, no clear owner, no step count, no branching context to trace the break.
Similar tools
Epismo OSFreemiumEpismo OS exists to solve that handoff problem. You save a case mid-session via MCP or CLI, get…
Agent XPaidAgent-X positions itself as an AI contact center platform for Vietnamese retail and e-commerce…
60 Minute CreatorFreemiumThe tool is a visual canvas where you connect blocks — image generation, video, voice, lipsync…
WPFixAgentPaidThe platform installs a lightweight connector inside wp-admin and pairs it with a SaaS…
Summary
TryPromptFlow is a diagnostic tool from Petrolyn Holdings that takes a description of what should happen, accepts code snippets, logs, screenshots, or workflow diagrams as evidence, and returns a structured failure analysis linked to the material you supplied. The output is a failure map, suggested instruction changes, a prioritized repair plan, an ownership matrix, and a verification checklist — not a vague summary. You review before acting. No live-system access, no automatic changes. The ceiling hits fast: one free diagnostic total, no API, no self-hosted option, and the tool issues no certification that a fix worked — your team still runs the verification checks manually.
Bottom line: Use this to triage a live agent looping on wrong decisions or an automation firing twice, with a log file to hand over; skip it when your team needs continuous monitoring or audit trails that persist across implementation cycles.
Pricing Plans
Subscription- Free Tier
- One free diagnostic total across all three Doctors and both modes
Free
Free
One free diagnostic total across all Doctors and modes
- One free diagnostic total
- No credit card required
Single Diagnostic
$29per month
One-time purchase for one live-failure diagnosis
- One workspace-owned credit
- Checkout temporarily unavailable
Core
$149per month
50 standard runs, 10 Workflow Doctor, 5 Agentic Workflow Doctor per month
- 3 seats
- Shared allowances
Growth
$299per month
100 standard runs, 25 Workflow Doctor, 25 Agentic Workflow Doctor, 5 Workflow OS Doctor per month
- 10 seats
- Shared allowances
View full pricing on trypromptflow.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Find your fit
Before you choose TryPromptFlow
More options in Workflow Builders. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Agent X
Paid
E-commerce and retail businesses
Pros
- Findings are linked back to the specific evidence you submitted — logs, screenshots, diagrams — so your team can distinguish a supported conclusion from an inferred one, which means you are not guessing which recommendation to trust.
- Three diagnostic tracks (pipeline failures, agent decision errors, cross-team coordination breakdowns) mean the report frame matches the failure class, so you are not getting generic automation advice when the real problem is an agent looping on a tool call.
- The output includes an ownership matrix assigning responsibility per step, so post-diagnosis the question 'who fixes which part' has a documented answer before the repair meeting starts.
- No live-system access and no automatic changes, so submitting a diagnostic does not carry the risk of the tool touching a production environment — your team reviews before anything moves.
- Supporting evidence is optional at intake, which means you can start a diagnosis from a description alone and add excerpts as they become available, rather than blocking the diagnostic on a complete evidence package.
Cons
- One free diagnostic total is the hard ceiling before payment is required — teams evaluating the tool against more than one failure type exhaust the trial on the first submission, before they can test whether the report quality justifies the cost on a second, different class of problem.
- TryPromptFlow issues no certification that a fix worked: the verification plan tells your team what checks to run, but your team runs them manually and compares the evidence. For teams that need an auditable pass/fail record as part of a compliance or release gate process, that gap means adding a separate documentation layer on top of the diagnostic output.
- No API and no self-hosted option means the tool cannot be embedded in an existing CI pipeline, incident management workflow, or internal tooling stack. Teams that need diagnostics triggered automatically on failure events or routed through an on-premises environment switch to a competitor or build the diagnostic logic internally.
- Saved Doctor reports let workspace users revisit submitted workflows and diagnoses, but the vendor states reports do not yet create a linked implementation or outcome timeline — meaning teams tracking whether a recommended fix was applied and whether it held over time maintain that record outside TryPromptFlow entirely.
About
- API Available
- No
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- September 24, 2026
Best For
Who it's for
- Teams managing complex AI or business workflows
- Users needing evidence-linked failure analysis
What it does well
- Investigating workflow failures in AI-enabled processes
- Verifying pre-launch workflow issues with evidence
- Diagnosing live production workflow breaks
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is TryPromptFlow free?
- TryPromptFlow offers a free option alongside paid upgrades. Check the current allowances and terms before choosing a plan.
Production workflow breaks with vague reports
A workflow breaks in production and the failure report you get is ‘it stopped working’ — no log excerpt, no clear owner, no step count, no branching context to trace the break.
TryPromptFlow from Petrolyn Holdings takes a description of what should happen plus code snippets, logs, screenshots, or workflow diagrams as evidence. It returns a failure map, suggested instruction changes, a prioritized repair plan, an ownership matrix, and a verification checklist linked to the supplied material. The vendor states three diagnostic tracks cover pipeline failures, agent decision errors, and cross-team coordination breakdowns. No live-system access or automatic changes are provided.
Pricing follows a subscription model with one free diagnostic total across all tracks and modes. Use cases center on investigating workflow failures in AI-enabled processes, verifying pre-launch issues with evidence, and diagnosing live production breaks.
Key strengths and limits
Findings stay tied to the exact logs, screenshots, or diagrams submitted so teams can separate supported conclusions from inferences. The ownership matrix assigns responsibility per step. The single free diagnostic sets a hard ceiling that exhausts the trial on the first submission. No certification of a successful fix is issued, leaving verification to manual team checks.
Who it is for / who should skip it
Best for teams managing complex AI or business workflows and users needing evidence-linked failure analysis. Skip it if more than one free diagnostic is required or an auditable pass/fail record is needed for compliance.
Contribute
- Work on TryPromptFlow? Claim this listing.
- Embed a badge for your README or site.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.