Cuey
Freemium
Power users comparing multiple LLMs daily
Semarize
FreemiumAPI
Scoring sales calls manually doesn't scale — one QA analyst, a spreadsheet, and a backlog of 400 calls from last quarter is the situation most teams are already in when they start looking for something like this.
£0/mo - £200/mo · Free tier: 250 free starter credits, 5 active kits, Sandbox access, API access · Checked Nov 4, 2026
Similar tools
CueyFreemiumCuey sits inside your existing ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini session and routes the same prompt…
AgiRankerFreeThe tool lets you rank frontier models on a 0–100 AGI Score, explore per-domain breakdowns…
oqoqoFreemiumOqoqo runs agent evaluation experiments on managed cloud infrastructure, spinning up sandboxed…
ClientCodedPaidClientCoded runs adversarial multi-turn conversations against your agent, scores every exchange…
Summary
The scraped source content does not match the tool data provided: the page describes a travel-identification app called Spotter, not a conversation evaluation API. No factual claims about the tool's workflow, integrations, credit consumption logic, or scoring mechanics can be sourced from the available content. What the validator context confirms is a usage-based freemium model where evaluations consume credits per scoring unit, a free tier exists, and paid tiers unlock higher volume. Beyond that, the description, differentiators, and production behavior cannot be written without a grounded source — fabricating them would violate the grounding rule.
Bottom line: Verified structural details support a freemium evaluation API suited to teams piloting call scoring at low volume, but no production claims about scoring accuracy, MEDDIC logic, or integration behavior can be made without a matching source page.
Pricing Plans
Usage-BasedLast verified 3 days ago- Price
- £0/mo - £200/mo
- Free Tier
- 250 free starter credits, 5 active kits, Sandbox access, API access
Builder PAYG
Free
Start building. Pay only for usage.
- 250 free starter credits
- 5 active kits
- Sandbox access
- API access
Team Plus
$70per month
For small teams rolling out consistently.
- 1,500 credits included
- 25 active kits
- 5 knowledge bases
- Workspace roles & permissions
- Email support
- Sandbox access
- API access
Platform Pro
$200per month
For larger teams and heavier usage.
- 5,000 credits included
- Unlimited kits
- 20 knowledge bases
- Workspace roles & permissions
- Priority support
- Sandbox access
- API access
Enterprise
Custom
Security, scale, and ultimate control.
- Custom credit allocation
- Unlimited kits
- Unlimited knowledge bases
- SSO + advanced access control
- Dedicated SLA
- Dedicated success manager
- Custom retention
View full pricing on semarize.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Find your fit
Before you choose Semarize
More options in LLM Evaluation & Benchmarks. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
AgiRanker
Free · Open source
Researchers tracking verifiable AI capability trends
Pros
- Usage-based credit model, so teams piloting at low call volume can validate scoring quality before committing budget — avoiding the sunk cost of an annual seat license on a tool that turns out to misfire on your call structure.
- API access is available, which means evaluation logic can be embedded directly into existing CRM or call-recording pipelines rather than requiring analysts to log into a separate dashboard for every review cycle.
- Freemium entry point allows QA teams to test custom evaluation frameworks against real call samples, so the scoring rubric is validated before it is rolled out to the full contact center.
Cons
- The scraped source page does not correspond to this tool — no claims about scoring accuracy, MEDDIC rubric coverage, latency under load, or integration behavior can be verified. Teams evaluating this tool in production cannot rely on this listing for those specifics and must test against their own call corpus.
- Without a confirmed self-hosted option, contact centers operating under strict data-residency requirements — where call recordings cannot leave a specific region or infrastructure — hit a hard wall and route to a self-hostable alternative instead.
About
- Platforms
- API-based (cloud)
- API Available
- Yes
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- June 5, 2026
Best For
Who it's for
- Sales and RevOps teams evaluating calls at scale
- QA and compliance teams auditing dialogue
- Organizations needing explainable evaluation logic
- Teams with custom evaluation frameworks
- Contact centers and customer success operations
What it does well
- Sales call quality and MEDDIC compliance scoring
- Customer service QA and compliance auditing
- Discovery process evaluation in sales conversations
- Contact center agent performance measurement
- Training and coaching data extraction from conversations
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is Semarize free?
- Semarize offers a free option alongside paid upgrades. Pricing: £0/mo - £200/mo. Check the current allowances and terms before choosing a plan.
- Does Semarize have an API?
- Yes. Semarize exposes a developer API. See the official documentation at https://semarize.com for details.
- What platforms does Semarize support?
- Semarize is available on: API-based (cloud).
Curated lists that include this category
The tool data describes a conversation evaluation API — built for sales QA, MEDDIC compliance scoring, and contact center auditing — but the scraped page provided belongs to an unrelated product (a travel-identification app named Spotter). Because the grounding rule prohibits asserting anything not supported by the source, a full production description cannot be written here.
The validator context confirms the following structural facts: the tool operates on a usage-based credit model, where each evaluation unit (called a ‘brick’) consumes credits; a free tier provides 250 credits; paid tiers are gated behind higher credit volumes and additional features. The tool is not agentic — it processes conversations submitted by users and returns evaluations; it does not initiate, loop, or self-direct.
To produce an accurate listing — covering the actual scoring workflow, supported evaluation frameworks, API request shape, and known production limits — the correct product page for this tool needs to be provided.
Contribute
- Work on Semarize? Claim this listing.
- Embed a badge for your README or site.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.