AI Undetectable
Freemium
Humanizing AI text
Perplexity-based detectors like ZeroGPT flag your prose not because it reads like a robot, but because it lacks the statistical irregularity humans produce naturally — and most rewriting tools guess at fixes rather than model the underlying signal. Humanize is a pair of static skills, installable in one command, that apply research-grounded rules to close that gap.
The two skills — `humanize` and `ai-check` — work inside Claude Code, ChatGPT, Gemini, Codex CLI, Cursor, and comparable agents, not as a hosted API but as instruction files dropped into your agent's context. `humanize` rewrites text across nine documented levers drawn from 50+ peer-reviewed sources through April 2026. `ai-check` runs the reverse: forensic scoring with quoted evidence flagging the specific phrases that read as AI-generated. Because the skills are static files, there is no server, no rate limit, and no external dependency — but there is also no adaptive learning, no feedback loop, and no guarantee a detector updated after April 2026 won't develop new signals the rules don't cover yet.
Bottom line: Pick this when you need offline, auditable humanization rules you can drop into an existing LLM workflow — plan on revisiting the skill files manually the moment a detector shifts its scoring model in ways the April 2026 literature doesn't cover.
Find your fit
More options in Writing Tools. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Freemium
Humanizing AI text
Freemium
SEO and content agencies
Humanize ships as two LLM skill files — `humanize` and `ai-check` — each containing static, research-grounded instructions that any compatible agent executes on demand. The core workflow is one install command that places the skills in the right directory for your agent, then a natural-language invocation: you point the skill at a piece of text, and the agent applies the rule set. No external API call leaves your environment. No account is required. The skills are MIT-licensed and readable in plain text, so every transformation rule is inspectable before you deploy.
The differentiating feature is the sourcing. Rather than heuristic rewrites or prompt-engineering folklore, the `humanize` skill models nine levers — syntactic variation, burstiness, lexical entropy, and related dimensions — drawn from detection literature spanning peer-reviewed sources through April 2026. The `ai-check` skill inverts this: it scores incoming text and quotes the specific phrases triggering AI-signal flags, giving you evidence rather than a black-box pass/fail score. The vendor-published benchmark describes 25 inputs evaluated against two independent scorers, though reproduction depends on the agent and model you run it in.
The tool fits teams that want humanization logic embedded in an existing LLM agent workflow without standing up a separate service, and researchers who need a citable, auditable rule set rather than a proprietary rewriter. It breaks when the target detector updates its scoring model after April 2026, when you need bulk processing through a REST endpoint, or when your pipeline requires structured JSON output with confidence scores — none of which the static skill architecture provides.
Installation paths differ per agent — the README documents separate commands for Claude Code, Codex CLI, ChatGPT desktop, Gemini, Cursor, Aider, OpenCode, Continue, and Copilot — but the skill content is identical across all of them. The `install.sh` script handles path resolution; the skills themselves are plain instruction files, which means updating them is a file replacement, not a dependency upgrade.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.