Clixad
Freemium
Developers who prefer terminal workflows
Long prompt, single shot, hope for the best — that's the default mode for most AI coding agents, and it falls apart the moment a task requires search, then planning, then verification before touching production code. Hanesu is an experimental workflow layer that sits inside your repo and gives agents a visible, structured process instead of a blank canvas.
The project borrows from Harness Engineering principles: work is broken into phases with task files, role handoffs, quality gates, and progress artifacts written to disk. Agents using runtimes like OpenCode, Codex, or Claude Code run through that structure rather than a monolithic prompt. The vendor explicitly flags this is not for small, obvious edits — a direct prompt is faster there. Where it earns its place is multi-step refactors, security-sensitive changes, or bugfix workflows where you need the agent to stop, surface what it found, and wait for your sign-off before proceeding.
Bottom line: Reach for Hanesu when an ambiguous, risky change needs documented decision artifacts and human gates baked into the agent's path — skip it when the edit is two lines and a test, because the overhead will cost more than the safety buys.
Find your fit
More options in CLI Coding Agents. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Freemium
Developers who prefer terminal workflows
Freemium
Developers preferring fully local agent execution
Hanesu installs into a repository via `npx create-hanesu` and adds a control layer that AI coding agents execute against. Rather than receiving one long prompt and running to completion, an agent working through Hanesu follows a sequence of task files organized into phases: search and discovery, artifact writing, phased coding, quality gate checkpoints, and a final verification step. The agent doesn’t decide when to move forward — the gate structure does, with human review required at configured checkpoints before the next phase unlocks.
The differentiating idea is the artifact trail. Each phase produces written outputs — decision records, findings, plans — that persist in the repo. For audit-sensitive or security-related changes, this means the reasoning behind a refactor isn’t buried in a chat window; it’s a committed file. Teams doing compliance work or post-incident reviews can read exactly what the agent considered before it touched anything.
Hanesu is explicitly scoped to ambiguous, multi-step, or risky work. The docs describe it as sitting inside your repo alongside agent runtimes rather than replacing them, which means it adds surface area to maintain. For teams already running Claude Code or Codex with their own prompt conventions, adopting Hanesu means learning a second layer of abstractions and keeping both in sync. Early-stage repositories with evolving structures will feel that friction most sharply.
The project is MIT-licensed with public source on GitHub, self-hosted by definition since it runs locally inside your repo, and carries no API dependency of its own — behavior is determined by whichever agent runtime you point at it.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.