Airuncode
Freemium
Developers preferring fully local agent execution
Running six AI agents on the same codebase without a process layer is how you end up with three engineers overwriting each other's files and no idea which commit caused last night's regression. Guildly puts a deterministic workflow — investigate, plan, ticket, branch, PR, review — between your instructions and the code.
Free tier: Beta access is controlled; new teams admitted weekly. All features available in free tier.
Each agent has a fixed role: PM writes PRDs, Manager routes tickets, SDEs work in isolated git worktrees, Reviewer signs off before anything merges. Every action traces back through a chain — line of code to ticket, ticket to PRD, PRD to the #general message that started it. The audit trail isn't a report you run after the fact; it's the structure the system runs on. That structure is also the ceiling: teams needing agents to adapt their process mid-sprint, or handle workflows that don't fit the six-role model, will hit the playbook's edges before long. The tool is in beta, with no API and no self-hosted option, so the surface you can extend is narrow.
Bottom line: Pick Guildly when you're a solo founder who wants a full engineering team working a defined ticket queue without babysitting every step — but plan a different architecture if your workflow requires agents that negotiate their own process or integrate into toolchains beyond Slack and GitHub.
Free macOS beta version available for download. Controlled beta access with new teams admitted weekly.
View full pricing on tryguildly.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Find your fit
More options in Coding Assistants. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Freemium
Developers preferring fully local agent execution
Freemium
Engineering teams needing private/local AI coding assistance
Most multi-agent setups require you to wire the agents together yourself — prompt chaining, context passing, error handling, all yours to maintain. Guildly ships the org chart instead. You get six pre-defined AI employees (PM, Manager, two SDEs, a front-end SDE, and a Reviewer) operating inside a Slack-style channel structure. You type in #general, the PM drafts a PRD, you approve it, the Manager breaks it into tickets, SDEs pull from the board and each opens their own git worktree, and nothing closes until a GitHub PR URL exists. The workflow is fixed by design.
The differentiating feature isn’t the agents — it’s the audit chain. Every line of code ties to a ticket. Every ticket ties to a PRD. Every PRD ties to the conversation thread that created it, including who approved what and when. The vendor describes this as ‘every change has a receipt.’ For teams where code provenance matters — compliance, client work, post-incident review — that chain is built in rather than bolted on afterward.
Guildly also decouples agent identity from the underlying model. The vendor states that memory, skills, and personality live with the employee, not the model or harness, so swapping Claude for Codex doesn’t reset your team’s history. Token usage per agent is visible on a dashboard, and an autopilot mode lets the team proceed without per-step approval — with cost limits to keep an unsupervised overnight run from draining your budget. The tool runs as a downloaded client; there is no API, no self-hosted deployment, and the beta is available at no cost with no paid tiers disclosed.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.