Get This Tool
Screenshots 1
Browser Use — Open-Source AI Browser Automation
Summary
The gap between a demo that navigates a site and one that survives a contested environment is wide. Browser Use scores well on benchmarks when LLM model and infrastructure work together. The real risk isn't the code—it's whether your setup protects against indirect prompt injection and catches silent failures in production.
Browser Use is an open-source Python library for autonomous web task automation using LLMs and computer vision. Teams use it to extract competitive data, fill forms at scale, and monitor page changes across hundreds of sites. The tool hits 89.1% success on standard benchmarks and comes with stealth browser support, CAPTCHA solving, and residential proxies across 195+ countries. The vendor also runs a cloud infrastructure option alongside the self-hosted library. Most production teams pair it with managed browser infrastructure and human approval gates for financial or sensitive actions. The sharp edge: LLMs can't reliably distinguish user instructions from webpage content, leaving agents vulnerable to indirect prompt injection attacks that succeed 24% of the time without defenses.
Bottom line: Pick this for extraction, form-filling, and monitoring workflows where you can sandbox the agent and add checkpoints. When you need sub-90% accuracy or direct access to financial systems, the infrastructure cost and approval friction become load-bearing—budget accordingly.
Hosted & API Pricing
The model is free to self-host. These are the creator's hosted/API options.Browser Session
Cloud browsers with advanced stealth
- Per-minute session billing
Proxy Bandwidth
Proxy bandwidth for cloud browsers
- Per-GB bandwidth
Browser Use Box - Small
2 vCPU u00b7 4 GB u00b7 20 GB
- 2 vCPU
- 4 GB RAM
- 20 GB storage
Browser Use Box - Medium
2 vCPU u00b7 8 GB u00b7 50 GB
- 2 vCPU
- 8 GB RAM
- 50 GB storage
Browser Use Box - Large
4 vCPU u00b7 16 GB u00b7 100 GB
- 4 vCPU
- 16 GB RAM
- 100 GB storage
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Pricing Plans
SubscriptionLast verified 1 month ago- Price
- $29/mo
- Free Tier
- 3 concurrent sessions, 10 agent tasks/mo
Pay As You Go
Start free with 3 concurrent sessions. Add credits anytime for pay-as-you-go usage.
- 3 concurrent sessions
- 10 agent tasks/mo
- Pay as you go
Dev
Built for scale with $29 in credits/mo
- 25 concurrent sessions
- Advanced stealth
- Top-ups, bring your own key, and more
Business
200 concurrent sessions
- 200 concurrent sessions
Scaleup
500 concurrent sessions
- 500 concurrent sessions
Enterprise
Annual credit pool, SLAs, data retention terms, dedicated support, and more.
- Annual credit pool
- SLAs
- Data retention terms
- Dedicated support
View full pricing on browser-use.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Community Performance Report Card
No community ratings yet. Be the first to rate this tool!
Community Benchmarks Community
Sign in to submit a benchmarkNo community benchmarks yet. Be the first to share a real-world data point.
Pros
Sign in to edit- 89.1% success rate on WebVoyager benchmark—production-ready for data extraction and form automation without constant human intervention.
- Open-source Python library with active maintenance and three parallel deployment paths: local, cloud-managed, or your own infrastructure.
- Stealth browser mode with CAPTCHA solving and rotating residential IPs across 195+ countries built in—reduces immediate block rates.
- Vision-based interactions instead of brittle DOM selectors—survives site layout changes that would break traditional automation.
- No vendor lock-in on agent logic—your prompts and task definitions stay portable across models and LLM providers.
Cons
Sign in to edit- LLMs can't reliably block prompt injection from webpage content—24% of unmitigated agents fall for attacks, requiring sandboxing and human checkpoints for sensitive actions.
- Success rate still 10 percentage points below 100%—silent failures in production require comprehensive logging and regular monitoring to catch.
- Each task navigation burns tokens proportional to page complexity—costs scale with site variation and multi-step workflows, especially for READ-heavy scraping.
- Deployment to production infrastructure requires choosing between managed cloud hosting or maintaining your own Browserbase/Kubernetes setup—no middle ground.
- Task reliability varies by site—JavaScript-heavy e-commerce and CAPTCHA-protected pages have different success profiles; benchmarks don't predict your specific URLs.
Community Reviews
Sign in to write a reviewNo reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
About
- Platforms
- Linux, macOS, Windows (Python 3.11+)
- Languages
- Python (primary); CLI available
- API Available
- Yes
- Self-Hosted
- Yes
- Last Updated
- 2026-05-08T17:16:57.750Z
Best For
Who it's for
- Data extraction teams monitoring 50+ competitor sites daily for pricing, availability, or content changes.
- Insurance/government form automation at scale—hundreds of applications submitted with minimal manual review.
- E-commerce and logistics workflows extracting tracking info, inventory, or product details from sites without public APIs.
- QA teams running multi-site end-to-end tests where DOM selectors would require constant maintenance.
What it does well
- Extract competitor pricing across 50+ retail sites daily and feed into dynamic pricing models.
- Automate insurance quote requests and government form submissions across multiple agencies without API access.
- Monitor content changes across 100+ pages in real time, triggering alerts when product availability or terms shift.
- Build training datasets from JavaScript-heavy e-commerce platforms that block traditional web scrapers.
- Fill customer support intake forms and intake workflows across multiple portals with structured data validation.
Integrations
Discussion Community
Sign in to commentNo discussion yet. Sign in to start the conversation.
Compare Browser Use — Open-Source AI Browser Automation
Spotted incorrect or missing data? Join our community of contributors.
Sign Up to ContributeCommunity Notes & Tips Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. General notes, observations, gotchas, and tips from people who use this tool day-to-day.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is Browser Use free?
- Browser Use has a permanent free tier alongside paid upgrades (paid plans from $29/mo). You can keep using a baseline version indefinitely without paying.
- Is Browser Use open source?
- Yes. Browser Use is open source — the source repository is at https://github.com/browser-use/browser-use.
- Does Browser Use have an API?
- Yes. Browser Use exposes a developer API. See the official documentation at https://browser-use.com for details.
- Can I self-host Browser Use?
- Yes. Browser Use supports self-hosting on your own infrastructure.
- What platforms does Browser Use support?
- Browser Use is available on: Linux, macOS, Windows (Python 3.11+).
Hours Saved & ROI Stories Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. Concrete time/cost savings, with context. e.g. "Cut my code review backlog from 4h to 45m per week."
Curated lists that include this category
