Skip to main content
AIDiveForge AIDiveForge

Bloom

FreemiumOpen SourceAPISelf-HostedAgentic

Anthropic's evaluation framework that auto-generates targeted test suites to measure specific AI behaviors at scale.

$17-$100+/mo · Free for everyone - Chat on web, desktop, and mobile with usage limits · Checked Oct 19, 2026

Similar tools

Get This Tool

License: MIT Any use incl. commercial
Local-run terms: MIT license permits unrestricted use, modification, and distribution for any purpose, including commercial applications, with proper attribution.

Screenshots 1

Summary

Bloom tackles a real gap in AI safety work: most evaluations are either broad (and miss edge cases) or manual (and don't scale). This tool generates reproducible test scenarios for narrow, high-stakes behaviors—like refusal consistency or prompt injection resilience—then scores models across thousands of permutations. The catch is structural: it's only as good as the seed prompts and judging logic you feed it, so teams still need to validate results manually for ambiguous cases. Free to use, but assumes you have both the domain expertise to set it up and the infrastructure to run it.

Bottom line: *Use this if you're a safety researcher or red-teaming group who needs systematic, repeatable measurements of specific model risks.*

Pricing Plans

SubscriptionLast verified 2 weeks ago
Price
$17-$100+/mo
Free Tier
Free for everyone - Chat on web, desktop, and mobile with usage limits

Free

Free

Free for everyone

  • Try Claude Chat on web, desktop, and mobile
  • Search the web, create files, and run code
  • Memory across conversations
  • Usage limits reset on rolling five-hour session window

Pro

$20per month
$17/yr Save 93%

For everyday work

  • Claude Code included
  • More usage
  • Hand off and schedule tasks
  • Claude Dashboards (beta)
  • More Claude models
  • Claude in Chrome and Microsoft 365

Max 5x

$100per month

For people who work with Claude all day - 5x more usage than Pro

  • Claude Code included
  • Everything in Pro, plus
  • 5x more usage than Pro per 5-hour session
  • Higher output limits for all tasks
  • Early access to advanced Claude features
  • Priority access at high traffic times

Max 20x

$200per month

For people who work with Claude all day - 20x more usage than Pro

  • Claude Code included
  • Everything in Pro, plus
  • 20x more usage than Pro per 5-hour session
  • Higher output limits for all tasks
  • Early access to advanced Claude features
  • Priority access at high traffic times

Enterprise

Custom

For large businesses operating at scale

  • Pricing is $20 per seat per month plus usage billed at API rates
  • Billed annually
  • Everything in Team plus advanced security and admin controls
  • SCIM, audit logs, custom data retention, role-based access

View full pricing on anthropic.com →

Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.

Find your fit

Before you choose Bloom

More options in LLM Evaluation & Benchmarks. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.

Browse LLM Evaluation & Benchmarks

Pros

  • Reproducible and targeted evaluations that quantify frequency and severity across automatically generated scenarios
  • Evaluations correlate strongly with hand-labelled judgments and reliably separate baseline models from intentionally misaligned ones
  • Researchers can extensively configure Bloom's behavior, through choosing models for each stage, adjusting interactions' length and modality
  • Using Bloom evaluations took only a few days to conceptualize, refine and generate
  • Integrates with Weights & Biases for experiments at scale and exports Inspect-compatible transcripts

Cons

  • Bloom is only as robust as the seeds and judging logic that power it; teams should treat seeds as living governance artifacts, and for ambiguous or highly contextual behaviors, periodic manual review is still necessary
  • Bloom's evaluation suite is unlikely to match the precise distribution of scenarios found in existing benchmarks, and since model behavior can be sensitive to context and prompt variations, direct comparisons are unreliable

About

Platforms
Python; integrates with Anthropic and OpenAI models via LiteLLM; supports Weights & Biases
Languages
Python
API Available
Yes
Self-Hosted
Yes
Last Updated
April 20, 2026

Best For

Who it's for

  • Regression testing, release gating, and tracking mitigations over time
  • AI safety and alignment research teams
  • Studying narrow but critical risks that may be missed by broader evaluations
  • Evaluating frontier AI models for specific behavioral traits
  • Automating evaluation suite generation without manual engineering

What it does well

  • Measuring behaviors like delusional sycophancy, long-horizon sabotage, self-preservation and self-preferential bias
  • Regression testing, release gating, and tracking mitigations over time
  • Investigating jailbreak susceptibility, self-preferential bias, and long-horizon sabotage risks
  • Quantifying frequency and severity of target behaviors across generated scenarios
  • Baseline model comparison and intentional misalignment detection

Integrations

Weights & Biases for experiments at scale; Inspect-compatible transcripts; LiteLLM backend for model API calls supporting Anthropic and OpenAI models

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bloom free?
Bloom offers a free option alongside paid upgrades. Pricing: $17-$100+/mo. Check the current allowances and terms before choosing a plan.
Is Bloom open source?
Yes. Bloom is open source — the source repository is at https://github.com/safety-research/bloom.
Does Bloom have an API?
Yes. Bloom exposes a developer API. See the official documentation at https://anthropic.com for details.
Can I self-host Bloom?
Yes. Bloom supports self-hosting on your own infrastructure.
When was Bloom released?
Bloom was first released in 2025.
What platforms does Bloom support?
Bloom is available on: Python; integrates with Anthropic and OpenAI models via LiteLLM; supports Weights & Biases.

Anthropic's evaluation framework that auto-generates targeted test suites to measure specific AI behaviors at scale.

Bloom tackles a real gap in AI safety work: most evaluations are either broad (and miss edge cases) or manual (and don't scale). This tool generates reproducible test scenarios for narrow, high-stakes behaviors—like refusal consistency or prompt injection resilience—then scores models across thousands of permutations. The catch is structural: it's only as good as the seed prompts and judging logic you feed it, so teams still need to validate results manually for ambiguous cases. Free to use, but assumes you have both the domain expertise to set it up and the infrastructure to run it.

*Use this if you're a safety researcher or red-teaming group who needs systematic, repeatable measurements of specific model risks.*

Share This Tool

Back to comparison
Contribute