chromie.dev vs Make (Integromat)
chromie.dev is paid, while Make (Integromat) has a free plan plus paid upgrades.
Which one should you try?
chromie.dev
PaidBest for Teams needing full execution auditability and compliance trails
Make (Integromat)
FreemiumBest for Teams automating repeatable work
Pricing, capabilities and platforms side by side. Prices are as of the "Pricing checked" date in the table.

chromie.dev
Chromie layers deterministic tool calls on top of an AI agent so the agent reasons about what to do, but structured tools handle the execution — every field fill, every form submission, every DOM interaction. Each invocation is logged with inputs, outputs, latency, and task context, so your compliance team has a replay trail rather than an opaque model decision. Self-healing tools re-resolve broken selectors automatically using fallback chains, so a DOM drift on your payer portal doesn't require an emergency fix. The ceiling appears when you need custom tool logic outside what Chromie ships — teams extending into non-standard workflows have to build or integrate additional tooling themselves.
| Attribute | chromie.dev | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Price | — | Free plan; paid pricing varies by credit allowance |
| Pricing checked | Not checked yet | Oct 18, 2026 |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| Open source | No | Not stated |
| Has API | No | Yes |
| Self-hosted option | No | Not stated |
| Platforms | Web-based SaaS | Web; documented API and MCP integrations |
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Made up your mind?
chromie.dev
PaidBest for Teams needing full execution auditability and compliance trails
Make (Integromat)
FreemiumBest for Teams automating repeatable work
Specs come from each tool's own site and docs (how we test). AIDiveForge is editorially independent.
