ExaminerOS
Summary
Most quiz tools make you choose between the exam you need and the format it supports — you get timed tests or audio responses, anti-cheat controls or therapy intake forms, never the same platform for both. ExaminerOS is built around the premise that schools, HR teams, therapists, and L&D departments all need assessment infrastructure, not just a quiz widget.
The platform covers four distinct assessment types — high-stakes exams with anti-cheat controls, retakeable quizzes with leaderboards, GTKY intake forms with browser-recorded audio and video, and anonymous polls — each with its own result engine. AI question generation drafts a full question set from a topic prompt or an uploaded PDF, which means a compliance officer can turn a policy document into a 40-question GDPR test without writing a single question manually. Tab-switch detection, randomised question order, and time-boxing are all described as active anti-cheat layers. The free plan is permanent, not a trial. Where the platform shows limits: open-ended written responses are not auto-graded, and there is no self-hosted option — your data lives on ExaminerOS infrastructure.
Bottom line: Pick this for running scored exams, compliance quizzes, or therapy intake forms under one login; plan a different stack when your assessment workflow requires automated scoring of written responses or data residency on your own servers.
Pricing Plans
Last verified 1 week ago- Free Tier
- $0 FREE PLAN, FOREVER - includes platform features: assessment builder, AI question generation, audio & video responses, real-time analytics, anti-cheat & proctoring, multi-role organisation, assessment library, PDF export, automated notifications, bulk CSV question import. Monthly credit model for AI usage.
Free Plan
Free plan, forever
- Effortless Assessment Builder
- AI Question Generation
- Audio & Video Responses
- Real-Time Analytics
- Anti-Cheat & Proctoring
- Multi-Role Organisation
- Curated Assessment Library
- PDF Export
- Automated Notifications
- Bulk CSV Question Import
- Monthly credit model for AI usage
View full pricing on examineros.com →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Community Performance Report Card
No community ratings yet. Be the first to rate this tool!
Community Benchmarks Community
Sign in to submit a benchmarkNo community benchmarks yet. Be the first to share a real-world data point.
Pros
Sign in to edit- AI question generation from a PDF or Word upload converts an existing document — a policy manual, a textbook chapter, a curriculum outline — into a deployable question set without manual authoring, so a compliance officer or curriculum lead skips the part of exam creation that takes the most time.
- Audio and video response capture runs entirely in the browser with no third-party tool, which means therapists collecting intake responses or HR teams running soft-skill screens get recorded answers stored alongside scored results in one place rather than stitching together a quiz tool and a video platform.
- Tab-switch detection, randomised question order, and time-boxing operate as a layered anti-cheat stack, so schools and certification bodies running unproctored remote exams get a defensible fairness posture without adding a separate proctoring subscription.
- Bulk CSV question import lets teams migrate hundreds of existing questions from a spreadsheet in a single step, which means switching from a legacy system does not require rebuilding an entire question bank by hand.
- Multi-role organisation management with role-based access means tutors see their cohorts, students see their assigned assessments, and administrators see everything — without custom permission configuration per user.
Cons
Sign in to edit- Open-ended written responses are not auto-graded: every short-answer or essay-type question requires a human reviewer to open the result, read the response, and assign a score. At exam volumes above a few dozen participants, this becomes a manual bottleneck that defeats the purpose of running assessments at scale. Teams needing automated written-response scoring evaluate platforms with built-in rubric-based or AI grading engines.
- There is no self-hosted or on-premises deployment option. Assessment data — including therapy intake recordings, HR screening responses, and student scores — is processed and stored on ExaminerOS infrastructure. Organisations subject to HIPAA, FERPA, or data residency regulations that require processing within a specific jurisdiction have no compliant path on this platform and move to self-hostable alternatives.
- The assessment library and template system are described but the platform provides precious little detail about how templates are versioned, whether subject-area coverage is independently verified, or how curricula-specific templates are kept aligned with exam board changes — meaning educators who clone a template for a high-stakes exam carry the validation burden themselves.
Community Reviews
Sign in to write a reviewNo reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience.
About
- API Available
- No
- Self-Hosted
- No
- Last Updated
- 2026-06-22T14:47:33.453Z
Best For
Who it's for
- Schools and educators
- Tutors and homeschool families
- HR and talent acquisition teams
- Therapists and counsellors
- Corporate L&D departments
What it does well
- Creating and delivering school exams with anti-cheat
- GTKY and intake forms with audio/video responses for therapists
- Corporate compliance training and onboarding quizzes
- Homeschool progress tracking and practice tests
- HR pre-employment screening and polls
Discussion Community
Sign in to commentNo discussion yet. Sign in to start the conversation.
Compare ExaminerOS
Spotted incorrect or missing data? Join our community of contributors.
Sign Up to ContributeCommunity Notes & Tips Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. General notes, observations, gotchas, and tips from people who use this tool day-to-day.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is ExaminerOS free?
- ExaminerOS has a permanent free tier alongside paid upgrades. You can keep using a baseline version indefinitely without paying.
- Is ExaminerOS open source?
- No — ExaminerOS is a closed-source tool. Source code is not publicly available.
Hours Saved & ROI Stories Community
Sign in to contributeBe the first to contribute. Concrete time/cost savings, with context. e.g. "Cut my code review backlog from 4h to 45m per week."
Curated lists that include this category
ExaminerOS is an AI-assisted assessment platform that handles exam creation, delivery, and results analysis across four formats: formal examinations, quizzes, GTKY and intake forms, and polls. The core workflow starts with the question builder — you write questions manually, generate them from a topic prompt via AI, or upload a PDF or Word document and let the platform convert it into a question set. From there, you configure timing, access controls, and anti-cheat settings, then deliver to participants who receive OTP login emails automatically. Results land in a dashboard showing score distributions, per-question failure rates, leaderboards, and completion status in real time.
The differentiating feature is the audio and video response type. Participants record spoken or on-camera answers directly in the browser — no third-party recording tool, no file upload step. The vendor states recordings are stored securely and play back inside the results view, which makes this format practical for therapy intake, language proficiency checks, and soft-skill screening where a multiple-choice answer tells you nothing useful.
For schools and corporate L&D teams, the anti-cheat layer — tab-switch detection, randomised question order, time-boxing, and access controls — covers the standard threat model for unproctored online exams. The curated assessment library and bulk CSV import make it viable for organisations migrating off legacy systems with large existing question banks. The ceiling appears when written responses need to be auto-graded at scale: the platform captures open-ended text and audio but does not score them algorithmically, which means a human reviews every non-multiple-choice answer. There is no self-hosted deployment option, so teams with data residency requirements or strict infosecurity policies that prohibit third-party data processing have no path to compliance on this platform.
The vendor reports 500+ active organisations, 10,000+ assessments created, and 250,000+ questions answered. The free plan is described as permanent with no stated time limit. Enterprise-grade features are implied in marketing copy but specific paid-only capabilities are not enumerated on the public page.