Ai Viral
Paid
Indie SaaS founders shipping with tools like Lovable or Cursor
Pasting rows into ChatGPT one at a time works until your spreadsheet has 500 companies and you need every answer cited, scored, and auditable — that's the gap AmpleData was built to close.
We could not reach the vendor website when checked on 2026-11-02. We have paused its website links. Any working downloads remain below.

$29/mo · Free tier: 100 cells enriched · Checked Jul 1, 2026
AmpleData takes a list of any entities — companies, papers, products — and fills user-defined columns by dispatching web search and crawl per row, extracting structured answers with an LLM, resolving conflicts across sources, and returning every cell with a source URL, extracted snippet, and confidence score attached. The per-cell pricing model means you pay for what you enrich, not a seat license you use twice a month. Where the tool hits friction: prompt quality determines answer quality, and weak prompts produce weak confidence scores you'll have to chase down and re-run. There is no self-hosted option, so teams with strict data residency requirements are blocked from the start.
Bottom line: The right call for a team enriching hundreds of company or research rows who need defensible, cited outputs — but teams with data residency requirements or the need to enrich structured databases directly will find the architecture doesn't fit.
Try AmpleData with no commitment.
Perfect for individuals and small projects.
For growing teams with higher enrichment needs.
High-volume enrichment for data-driven orgs.
View full pricing on ampledata.io →
Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.
Find your fit
More options in Business. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Paid
Indie SaaS founders shipping with tools like Lovable or Cursor
Freemium
Marketing teams running social ad campaigns
Copying rows into a chat interface doesn’t scale, and the answers you get back aren’t cited, aren’t scored, and can’t be audited when a stakeholder asks where the data came from. AmpleData addresses this by accepting a list — companies, academic papers, job postings, properties, anything with a name — and letting you describe the columns you want filled in plain English. The tool dispatches a web search and crawl per row, runs an LLM over the results to extract structured answers, resolves conflicts when sources disagree, and writes the result back into the sheet. Each cell carries a source URL, an extracted snippet, and the reasoning used to arrive at the answer.
The differentiating feature isn’t the enrichment itself — it’s the per-cell citation and confidence score. The vendor describes this as ‘researched, not AI-generated’: click any cell and you see exactly which source URL produced the answer and how confident the model is. You can sort a column by confidence, identify the cells worth spot-checking, and re-run a column with a refined prompt without touching the rows that already scored high. That feedback loop is what separates a one-shot batch process from something you can actually trust at scale.
AmpleData fits teams running enrichment on lists where the source of truth is publicly available on the web — lead lists, YC company directories, academic paper metadata, remote policy research. It does not fit teams enriching from private databases, internal documents, or sources behind authentication walls. There is no self-hosted deployment path, which blocks any organization with hard data residency or compliance requirements before they write a single prompt.
Developers can drive the same enrichment engine over HTTP using scoped, revocable API keys generated from account settings. The API accepts a source ID, a list of key columns, and column definitions in the same plain-English format as the UI, then returns cited, confidence-scored cells as JSON. API calls bill against the same balance as the app with no separate platform fee or minimum — the code sample in the docs shows a two-step curl pattern: kick off an enrichment job, then poll for results.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.