Clixad
Freemium
Developers who prefer terminal workflows
You ship an AI coding agent, it returns code that looks correct, tests fail, and you have no record of what the agent actually did or why the run scored the way it did. Orbit exists for exactly that gap.
Orbit wraps agent runs in a controlled loop: pick a task from a dependency-ordered backlog, hand it to whichever agent backend you have configured, run tests and lint against the output, and write inspectable JSON artifacts before the task is ever marked complete. If the agent cannot pass the validation gate, the orbit does not close — no silent failures, no optimistic merges. The artifact trail covers what the agent returned, how the run scored against a rubric, and a human-readable recommendation to accept, iterate, or stop. It runs fully self-hosted with no hosted option and no API key required for the replay demo.
Bottom line: Orbit is the right harness for teams who need proof that an agent's output actually passed tests before anyone reviews it — it is not a solution for teams who need a hosted orchestration service or want to skip writing the task definitions and validation config themselves.
Find your fit
More options in CLI Coding Agents. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.
Freemium
Developers who prefer terminal workflows
Freemium
Developers preferring fully local agent execution
Orbit functions as a harness around AI coding agents rather than an agent itself. The core workflow is a bounded loop: a dependency-aware backlog selects one task, the harness delegates execution to a configured agent (Claude, Codex, Cursor, or any CLI that speaks JSON), then runs tests, lint, and type checks against the result. Only a passing validation gate closes the orbit. Every run writes four artifacts — a structured agent result, a rubric-scored evaluation, an accept/iterate/stop recommendation, and a human-readable progress log — so nothing about the run is implicit.
The differentiating feature is agent-neutral adapter contracts. The vendor page describes the architecture as swapping coding agents behind the same interface and comparing artifacts instead of anecdotes. That means a team can run Claude and Codex against identical tasks, collect evaluation JSON from both runs, and make the comparison on evidence rather than gut feel. This is the capability that makes Orbit useful for teams evaluating which agent backend to standardize on.
Orbit fits repos that already have strong test and lint coverage — the validation gates require something to gate against. A repo with sparse tests gets the artifact trail but loses the self-healing loop, because there is nothing to prove completion. The tool is intentionally scoped: the vendor page describes it as ‘intentionally small,’ with contributions expected to make the harness easier to verify or replay rather than expand its surface area. Teams that need a hosted service, a visual workflow builder, or a managed backlog system will hit the ceiling of what a self-hosted Python harness provides and will look elsewhere.
Installation is a git clone and a pip install; the deterministic replay demo runs without an API key using a MOCK flag. MIT licensed, with no paid tier and no commercial hosted variant. Artifacts are JSON and Markdown files written to disk, making them readable by any downstream audit or CI process without proprietary tooling.
Sign in to rate this tool or suggest an edit.