Skip to main content
AIDiveForge AIDiveForge

TaskyTrack

Freemium

The hour after a discovery call is where projects quietly start failing — requirements half-remembered, notes scattered across three apps, and a developer waiting on a brief that takes two hours to write by hand. TaskyTrack exists to close that gap.

$20/mo · Free tier: 3 specs / month, Up to 15-min meetings · Checked Oct 31, 2026

Similar tools

Summary

TaskyTrack takes a call transcript or a calendar-connected recording and produces a structured spec — feature breakdown, data schema, UI direction — grounded in what the client actually said. You review it, edit what needs changing, then export directly to a spec.md, a paste-ready prompt for an AI coding tool, or a scaffolded GitHub repo. The workflow is a single pass: call in, spec out, build tool next. The ceiling appears when your discovery calls contain ambiguity that requires back-and-forth clarification — the AI drafts from what was said, not what was meant, and unresolved scope still lands on you.

Bottom line: Pick this if you run agency discovery calls and need a reviewed brief the same afternoon; plan for manual intervention when the call itself was underspecified or the client changed direction mid-conversation.

Pricing Plans

SubscriptionLast verified 4 days ago
Price
$20/mo
Free Tier
3 specs / month, Up to 15-min meetings

Free

Free

Start free, no card required

  • 3 specs / month
  • Up to 15-min meetings
  • Manual paste + send-a-bot capture
  • Spec.md & copy-as-prompt export
  • Human-in-the-loop review

Pro

$20per month

MOST POPULAR

  • 30 specs / month
  • Up to 60-min meetings
  • Everything in Free
  • Automatic calendar capture
  • ~15 bot meetings a month
  • GitHub repo scaffolding

Max

$100per month

Unlimited specs

  • Unlimited specs / month
  • Up to 120-min meetings
  • Everything in Pro
  • Unlimited specs
  • Unlimited auto-capture (fair use)
  • 2-hour meetings u00b7 priority

View full pricing on taskytrack.com →

Pricing may have changed since last verified. Check the official site for current plans.

Find your fit

Before you choose TaskyTrack

More options in Meeting Assistants. Compare pricing, platforms, and features side by side.

Browse Meeting Assistants

Pros

  • Generates a feature-by-feature requirements list, data schema, and UI direction from a single transcript, which means the manual brief-writing step — typically hours per project — is replaced by a review-and-edit pass.
  • Calendar-connected note-taker joins chosen meetings automatically and delivers a spec the moment the call ends, so the window where client momentum drops and deals stall is eliminated without adding a manual step.
  • Export to spec.md, AI coding tool prompt, or GitHub repo scaffold in one click, which means the spec feeds directly into the build without retyping or reformatting for whichever tool the team uses.
  • Every requirement in the generated brief traces back to what the client said in the call, so 'they asked for X, you built Y' disputes have a documented starting point rather than competing memories.
  • Free to start with no card required, so a freelancer or small agency can validate the tool against a real client call before committing.

Cons

  • The AI drafts from what was explicitly said — when a discovery call contains vague scope, contradictory client statements, or significant silence on critical requirements, the generated spec inherits those gaps. Teams still own the judgment call on what the client actually needs, and a bad call produces a confidently formatted bad spec.
  • There is no API and no self-hosting option, so teams whose workflow depends on automatically pushing generated specs into Jira, Notion, or a custom project management system cannot automate that handoff — someone copies and pastes, which reintroduces manual work at the exit point.
  • The tool produces one structured output per call with no built-in loop for async client review or spec versioning inside the platform. When a project requires multiple rounds of scope negotiation before the brief is approved, teams track revisions outside TaskyTrack — and at that point, a product management tool with native client collaboration becomes the more defensible choice.

About

API Available
No
Self-Hosted
No
Last Updated
September 16, 2026

Best For

Who it's for

  • Agencies handling multiple client discovery calls
  • Freelance developers and designers
  • In-house product and sales teams

What it does well

  • Convert discovery calls into scoped briefs the same day
  • Generate data schemas and UI directions from meeting content
  • Export specs directly to AI coding tools or GitHub

Integrations

Google Calendar

Frequently Asked Questions

Is TaskyTrack free?
TaskyTrack offers a free option alongside paid upgrades. Pricing: $20/mo. Check the current allowances and terms before choosing a plan.

The gap after discovery calls

The hour after a discovery call is where projects quietly start failing — requirements half-remembered, notes scattered across three apps, and a developer waiting on a brief that takes two hours to write by hand. TaskyTrack takes a call transcript or a calendar-connected recording and produces a structured spec with feature breakdown, data schema, and UI direction grounded in what the client actually said. Users review and edit the output, then export directly to spec.md, a paste-ready prompt for an AI coding tool, or a scaffolded GitHub repo. The workflow runs in a single pass: call in, spec out, build tool next.

Calendar connection and exports

Google Calendar integration lets the note-taker join chosen meetings automatically and deliver the spec the moment the call ends. One-click export feeds the spec straight into the build step without retyping or reformatting.

Where it falls short

The AI drafts from what was explicitly said. When a discovery call contains vague scope, contradictory statements, or silence on key requirements, the generated spec inherits those gaps. There is no API and no self-hosting option, so teams cannot push specs automatically into Jira, Notion, or custom systems.

Who it is for and who should skip it

Agencies handling multiple client discovery calls, freelance developers and designers, and in-house product and sales teams gain the most from the review-and-edit pass and direct exports. Teams that need automatic handoff to project management tools or that run on ambiguous calls should skip it, as unresolved scope still lands on the user.

Share This Tool

Compare This Tool
Contribute

Related Listings

ProductivityFreemium

via.email

The core workflow is email-forward-and-reply: you forward a document, paste in text, or describe a task in the subject line, and one of…

VerifiedFreemium
View via.email
ProductivityFreemium

Breadcromb

Trace AI sits inside the browser and constructs a personal knowledge graph as you research, read, and review — connecting pages, notes, and…

VerifiedFreemium
View Breadcromb