tutti vs Velyr

tutti and Velyr are both ai agent apps tracked by AIDiveForge. Below is a side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, platforms, and ownership — sourced from each tool's live website and verified before publishing.

tutti

The core idea: instead of agents exchanging summaries, they share a live project state. Codex sees exactly what Claude changed, what's running, and what's pending — no copy-paste required. The `@` reference system lets any agent or teammate pull from any file or conversation in the workspace without re-uploading. A GUI control center surfaces every pending approval and running task in one view, so you sign off without opening a terminal. The ceiling appears when your workflow involves agents outside Tutti's supported roster or when you need fine-grained infra control — the platform is built for GUI-driven coordination, not headless pipeline automation.

Velyr

Every Monday, the agent reads your PostHog analytics, scans your GitHub repo, picks the single highest-impact conversion problem across your full funnel, and opens a PR with a Vercel preview attached. You reply YES or NO over Telegram — nothing merges without your explicit sign-off, and you see the exact diff before deciding. If a merged change causes site-wide bounce rate to spike by 15 percentage points within 48 hours, Velyr opens a revert PR automatically. That loop works well for React, Next.js, and Vite sites on Vercel. It stops entirely if your stack is Shopify, Webflow, or anything else that does not expose source code.

Attribute	tutti	Velyr
Pricing	Free	Paid
Price	—	€29/mo
Free trial	No	14 days
Open source	Yes	No
Has API	No	No
Self-hosted option	No	No
Platforms	—	Web (GitHub + Vercel/Netlify/etc.)
Pros	Shared live project state across agents, so Codex reads exactly what Claude produced without a re-briefing step — eliminating the context decay that compounds across every handoff. The `@` reference system lets any agent pull any file or conversation from the workspace by name, so the copy-paste loop between agent sessions stops entirely. Goal-to-task decomposition with manual assignment review, so you keep control over which agent runs each step without scripting the breakdown yourself. Apps run inside the workspace and are callable by agents using existing subscriptions, so Claude can write a PRD and directly invoke a design tool without switching windows or re-authenticating. GUI control center aggregates every running task and pending approval in one view with one-click sign-off, so you stay in the loop without monitoring separate agent sessions across multiple tabs.	Writes actual code and opens a PR rather than a list of suggestions, so conversion improvements ship instead of sitting in a backlog waiting for an engineer to pick them up. Telegram-gated approval on every change, meaning nothing merges without your explicit YES and a review of the exact diff — you never discover a surprise change in production. Automatic rollback PR triggered if bounce rate spikes by 15 percentage points within 48 hours, so a bad fix does not require you to diagnose the damage and manually revert it. Full-funnel analysis across every page in the repo cross-referenced against PostHog data, so the agent finds drop-off points beyond the homepage that manual CRO reviews routinely miss. Brand Guardrails let you define rules the agent must respect before a suggestion reaches you, which means you are not reviewing and rejecting off-brand copy changes every week.
Cons	Teams that need headless, programmatic pipeline control — triggering agents via API, chaining steps based on returned values, running without a GUI — hit a structural wall. Tutti is built around a visual workspace; there is no evident scripted orchestration layer for fully automated pipelines. Those teams move to a code-first framework or an API-driven orchestration tool instead. The in-workspace app catalog is community-and-vendor-built and early-stage. When a workflow requires an app or integration that does not exist in the catalog, teams either build a custom app (which requires development time Tutti does not eliminate) or accept that the agent must leave the workspace to use an external tool, breaking the shared-state model. Agent support is bounded by whichever models Tutti explicitly connects — Claude, Codex are named in the vendor content. Teams running workflows on models or providers outside that set cannot bring those agents into the shared workspace, which forces the same copy-paste context problem Tutti exists to solve.	Hard-locked to React, Next.js, or Vite on Vercel with GitHub and PostHog — a team on Remix, deployed to AWS, or using Mixpanel cannot use this tool at all and needs a different solution from the start. One fix ships per week, decided by the agent's prioritization model. Teams running a high-volume A/B testing program that needs multiple concurrent experiments or manual hypothesis control will hit that constraint immediately and require a dedicated experimentation platform instead. The rollback threshold is fixed at a 15-percentage-point bounce rate spike — teams with volatile traffic, seasonal patterns, or low-volume sites where that threshold fires on noise rather than signal have no way to adjust it and will open rollback PRs they did not actually want. No API is available, so Velyr cannot be triggered by external events, integrated into a CI pipeline, or connected to internal tooling — the workflow is the workflow, and teams that need to embed conversion automation into a broader system will find this a closed box.

Bottom line

Tutti is free while Velyr is paid; tutti is open source. Choose based on which difference matters most for your workflow.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between tutti and Velyr?

tutti is Free and open source, while Velyr is Paid. Compare pricing, free trial, API, platforms, and pros/cons in the table above on AIDiveForge.

Is tutti better than Velyr?

It depends on your workflow. Use the side-by-side attributes (pricing, open source, API, self-hosted, platforms) to decide. AIDiveForge does not rank a universal winner — we publish verified facts so you can choose.

tutti vs Velyr: which should I pick?

Pick tutti if its pricing model, openness, or platform fit matches your constraints; pick Velyr otherwise. Check free-trial availability on each listing if you want to test before committing.

Comparison data is sourced and verified by the AIDiveForge data pipeline. AIDiveForge is editorially independent.