Myna vs Weave

Myna and Weave are both personal assistants tracked by AIDiveForge. Below is a side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, platforms, and ownership — sourced from each tool's live website and verified before publishing.

Myna

Myna runs entirely inside Claude Code as a local-first agent layer — the vendor describes it as an AI Chief of Staff, covering meeting prep, inbox triage, project status tracking, escalation drafting, and retrieval of past decisions. The architecture the GitHub page documents is 12 agents and 31 skills, built autonomously by Claude Code itself. Nothing leaves your machine, which means it is a viable option for teams operating under data residency constraints where SaaS tools are ruled out before the demo ends. The ceiling appears quickly for teams who do not already live in Claude Code — this is not a standalone app or a web UI, it is a plugin layer, so anyone outside that workflow starts at zero setup cost before getting to zero productivity gain.

Weave

Weave watches your screen via OCR, pulls Gmail and Calendar data, and stores all of it locally in SQLite — so the context it works from is yours and stays on your machine. The morning brief surfaces to-dos, overdue commitments, and response debt before your day starts. When you need action rather than summary, a browser agent plans and executes steps toward a goal, and a separate macOS agent drives native apps by voice or intent. The ceiling appears early: this is a solo developer project at 72 commits with no hosted fallback, no API, and no documented path for teams or shared memory.

Attribute	Myna	Weave
Pricing	Free	Free
Free trial	No	No
Open source	Yes	Yes
Has API	No	No
Self-hosted option	Yes	Yes
Platforms	—	macOS
Pros	Fully local execution under MIT license, so teams with data residency requirements can use an AI assistant without routing calendar, email, or project data through a third-party server. Twelve agents covering meeting prep through escalation drafting operate autonomously inside Claude Code, so you are not manually triggering each step or maintaining a separate automation layer. Open-source codebase with MIT license, so a team that hits a capability gap can fork and extend rather than waiting on a vendor roadmap or paying for a feature tier. Self-hosted with no API dependency described, so there is no service outage or pricing change upstream that takes your workflow offline. Covers the full weekly overhead loop — briefings, inbox triage, status tracking, decision recall — inside one plugin layer, so context does not live across five disconnected tools that each require manual updates.	All captured data — screen OCR, email, calendar, contacts — is stored locally in SQLite, so you are not trading your personal context for a vendor's data pipeline. The browser agent accepts a goal and executes the steps to reach it without per-step instruction, so repetitive research or form-filling tasks run without you staying on the loop. Commitment and response-debt tracking surfaces what you said you would do and have not done yet, which means the morning brief catches the dropped thread before the other person follows up. Native macOS app control by voice or stated goal means automation extends beyond the browser to the full desktop environment, so you are not limited to web-only task execution. Fully free with no paid-only features and self-hosted by design, so there is no pricing gate on any capability and no subscription to cancel when the project goes dormant.
Cons	Myna is a Claude Code plugin, not a standalone application — teams not already using Claude Code cannot reach any of the 31 skills without first adopting that environment, which is a non-trivial prerequisite for organizations running different dev toolchains. No API surface is described on the project page, which means teams that need to connect Myna to external systems programmatically — feeding it data from a project management tool or pushing its output to a dashboard — have no documented integration path and will need to extend the codebase themselves. With six stars and zero forks at the time the page was scraped, the community contribution base is thin — teams that depend on this for daily operations and hit a bug are largely dependent on the core maintainer's response cadence, which is the condition under which a team with production uptime requirements switches to a vendor-backed alternative with a support contract.	The setup requires cloning the repo and running npm dev commands — there is no packaged installer documented beyond electron-builder config. The first OS update that breaks an Electron or native dependency lands on you to debug, with no issue history and no maintainer response SLA. There is no API surface. Any workflow that needs Weave's memory or agents accessible from another tool, script, or service hits a dead end — teams who need that integration path switch to a self-hosted open-source alternative like Mem0 or a custom LangChain memory layer. The macOS agent and browser agent have no documented multi-user or profile separation. A household or small team that wants shared context or separate memory spaces finds no path forward in the current architecture — this is a single-user, single-machine design.

Bottom line

Myna and Weave are closely matched on pricing model, openness, and API availability — pick by feature set and platform support in the table above.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Myna and Weave?

Myna is Free and open source, while Weave is Free and open source. Compare pricing, free trial, API, platforms, and pros/cons in the table above on AIDiveForge.

Is Myna better than Weave?

It depends on your workflow. Use the side-by-side attributes (pricing, open source, API, self-hosted, platforms) to decide. AIDiveForge does not rank a universal winner — we publish verified facts so you can choose.

Myna vs Weave: which should I pick?

Pick Myna if its pricing model, openness, or platform fit matches your constraints; pick Weave otherwise. Check free-trial availability on each listing if you want to test before committing.

Comparison data is sourced and verified by the AIDiveForge data pipeline. AIDiveForge is editorially independent.