Engram vs Selvedge

Engram and Selvedge are both inference engines & infra tracked by AIDiveForge. Below is a side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, platforms, and ownership — sourced from each tool's live website and verified before publishing.

Engram

Engram sits between your IDE and its file reads, maintaining a local SQLite summary of your codebase so agents pull compressed context instead of raw files. The vendor states an 89% measured token reduction. It installs via npm, runs locally with zero cloud dependency, and connects to Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue, Aider, Codex, Windsurf, and Zed through a combination of OpenVSX extensions, an Anthropic plugin, and adapter scripts. The bug-prevention layer surfaces past mistakes from revert history before the agent touches that code path again. This is a passive interceptor, not an agent — it does not plan tasks or run autonomously.

Selvedge

Selvedge is a local MCP server that AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot) call as they work, logging the reasoning behind every change into a SQLite file that lives next to your code under .selvedge/. Queries are entity-scoped — you ask about users.email or deps/stripe, not line numbers — so the answer surfaces in the same terms you search in. The vendor describes zero telemetry, no accounts, and no external servers; everything stays on disk. The wall appears when your team needs cross-repo provenance or wants to pipe this data into an existing observability stack — Selvedge emits records but does not integrate with those systems out of the box.

Attribute	Engram	Selvedge
Pricing	Free	Free
Free trial	No	No
Open source	Yes	Yes
Has API	Yes	No
Self-hosted option	Yes	Yes
Platforms	Node.js (npm); works in Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue, Aider, Codex CLI, Windsurf, Zed	Linux, macOS, Windows (via Python)
Released	2026-04	2026-05
Pros	Local SQLite storage with no cloud dependency, which means your codebase summary never leaves your machine — relevant for teams under data-residency constraints that rule out cloud-hosted context tools. The vendor states an 89% measured token reduction on repeated file reads, so usage-based billing in tools like Cursor or rate-limited Claude Code sessions consume significantly fewer tokens per session. Bug-prevention indexing pulls from your repo's revert history, so an agent approaching a previously broken file sees the failure pattern before it writes — instead of repeating it. A single context store shared across Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Continue, Aider, Codex, Windsurf, and Zed, which means switching tools mid-project or running two tools in parallel does not require rebuilding context from scratch. Apache 2.0 license with self-hosted operation, so teams can audit the full codebase, fork it, or adapt the adapter layer without negotiating a commercial agreement.	Reasoning is captured in the same context window that produced the change — not reconstructed from the diff afterward — which means the intent survives even when the original prompt, the developer who wrote it, and the model version are all gone. Entity-scoped queries (selvedge blame payments.amount, selvedge diff users --since 30d) let you ask about the things you actually search for rather than hunting through line-level history, so a schema audit that would take an afternoon takes a single command. Fully local storage in a SQLite file with no accounts, no telemetry, and no external servers, which means sensitive schema and API change history never leaves the machine — a hard requirement in compliance-heavy environments. Provider-agnostic MCP integration wires into Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot through a single setup command, so teams already using any of those agents get provenance logging without changing their workflow. Full-text search across all logged events (selvedge search "stripe") and changeset grouping (selvedge changeset add-stripe-billing) mean you can reconstruct the full scope of a feature build after the fact, which is the audit trail that git log alone cannot provide.
Cons	When the codebase changes rapidly — active feature branches, frequent refactors, multiple contributors merging daily — the SQLite summaries drift from the actual file state. The agent works from a compressed snapshot that no longer matches reality. Teams in this situation either rebuild the index on every session (reducing the cost savings) or accept that the context is partially stale. The bug-prevention layer depends on revert history existing and being parseable. Greenfield projects or repos with shallow or non-standard Git history get no benefit from that feature — it simply does not fire. Engram has no UI, no observability dashboard, and no way to inspect what the agent is actually receiving as context. When an agent produces unexpected output, diagnosing whether the cause is a stale summary requires digging into the SQLite database directly. Teams that need audit trails or explainability for agent decisions will hit this ceiling and move to a tool that exposes its context pipeline.	Selvedge has no API and no export integration — teams that need to push reasoning records into an existing compliance platform, a data warehouse, or a centralized observability system must write their own pipeline against the SQLite file, adding a maintenance surface that grows with audit requirements. The store is scoped to a single local project directory; teams running multi-repo codebases where an agent change in one repo depends on a change in another get no cross-repo provenance, and at that point teams managing compliance across repositories will move to a dedicated audit-log solution that operates at the organization level. Selvedge only captures what the agent explicitly logs through the MCP tool call — if an agent skips the log_change call, makes changes outside a supported tool, or the MCP connection drops mid-session, that change has no recorded reasoning and the gap is invisible in the history.

Bottom line

Only Engram exposes a public API. Choose based on which difference matters most for your workflow.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Engram and Selvedge?

Engram is Free and open source, while Selvedge is Free and open source. Compare pricing, free trial, API, platforms, and pros/cons in the table above on AIDiveForge.

Is Engram better than Selvedge?

It depends on your workflow. Use the side-by-side attributes (pricing, open source, API, self-hosted, platforms) to decide. AIDiveForge does not rank a universal winner — we publish verified facts so you can choose.