Coasty vs Make (Integromat)

Coasty and Make (Integromat) are both workflow automation tracked by AIDiveForge. Below is a side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, platforms, and ownership — sourced from each tool's live website and verified before publishing.

Coasty

Coasty operates real software by sight: it browses portals, clicks, types, and verifies its own output without requiring an API from the target system. The vendor states it ranks first on OSWorld at 85.60% task completion, and the agent is designed to recover autonomously when a UI shifts — which is the specific failure mode that grinds traditional automation to a halt. It fits teams running long, multi-step workflows across carrier portals, ERPs, TMS platforms, or Microsoft 365 consoles. The ceiling appears when you need deep bidirectional data integration rather than screen-level execution; at that point, a native API connector will outperform it on speed and reliability.

Make (Integromat)

Make lets you build automation sequences by dragging operations onto a canvas—no coding required. You're essentially replacing repetitive work (data entry, email sends, syncing spreadsheets to CRMs) with conditional logic that runs on schedule or trigger. The free tier includes 1,000 operations per month; paid plans start around $10/month for 10,000 operations. The honest catch: the free plan's operation limit exhausts quickly for serious workflows, and the visual builder can feel clunky for genuinely complex logic compared to traditional automation code.

Attribute	Coasty	Make (Integromat)
Pricing	Paid	Paid
Price	$99 flat Unlimited plan; $0.05 per /v1/predict API call	$9.99/mo
Free trial	No	No
Open source	No	No
Has API	Yes	Yes
Self-hosted option	No	No
Platforms	Desktop, Browser, Cloud VMs	Web, API
Languages	—	English
Released	—	2013
Pros	Operates any portal by sight without requiring an API from the target system, so workflows that were permanently blocked behind legacy or API-less software become automatable without an IT integration project. Autonomous UI recovery means when a carrier or ERP portal updates its interface, the agent replans from the new screen state rather than throwing an error — so your operations team stops getting paged at 9pm because a scraper broke. Long-horizon task execution across hundreds of steps, so multi-portal workflows like quoting 20 carriers per submission or reconciling month-end statements run without a person stitching together each handoff. Computer-use API with structured JSON output, so development teams can embed screen-reading intelligence into custom agents without building the underlying vision and action model themselves. Human approval and recorded audit trail on sensitive workflows like MSP tenant offboarding, so regulated teams have the sign-off documentation they need without adding a manual review queue on top of the automation.	Easy to use for non-technical users Extensive integration options Automate complex workflows
Cons	Screen reading adds execution latency per step that a direct API call does not. Workflows requiring real-time or high-frequency data sync — think live inventory updates or sub-second transactional reconciliation — hit this wall immediately, and teams at that scale switch to native API integrations or ETL pipelines instead. No self-hosted deployment option exists. Teams in environments with strict data residency or air-gapped network requirements cannot keep task execution and screenshot data on their own infrastructure, which is a hard blocker in certain regulated verticals and the primary reason teams move to a self-hostable RPA alternative. Complex multi-agent branching logic that depends on what a prior step returned eventually outgrows what screen-level execution can express cleanly. Teams building workflows beyond four or five conditional branches report adding a custom code orchestration layer — at which point they are maintaining two systems and the simplicity argument for Coasty weakens.	Limited free plan functionality Some advanced features require paid tiers

Bottom line

Coasty and Make (Integromat) are closely matched on pricing model, openness, and API availability — pick by feature set and platform support in the table above.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Coasty and Make (Integromat)?

Coasty is Paid, while Make (Integromat) is Paid. Compare pricing, free trial, API, platforms, and pros/cons in the table above on AIDiveForge.

Is Coasty better than Make (Integromat)?

It depends on your workflow. Use the side-by-side attributes (pricing, open source, API, self-hosted, platforms) to decide. AIDiveForge does not rank a universal winner — we publish verified facts so you can choose.