Bohay vs VulnFeed

Bohay and VulnFeed are both cli coding agents tracked by AIDiveForge. Below is a side-by-side comparison of pricing, capabilities, platforms, and ownership — sourced from each tool's live website and verified before publishing.

Bohay

The tool gives you a single interface to watch every agent's real status, not what the CLI reports but whether the process is actually doing work. File leases prevent overlapping edits before they're even assigned; isolated git worktrees keep agents from colliding on the same checkout; a test gate must pass before a task merges. Sessions survive terminal restarts, and each agent reloads its own chat history without you repasting flags. The orchestration board tracks dependencies so tasks wait for upstream work to clear the quality gate before they start.

VulnFeed

VulnFeed is an MCP server that reads your lockfile directly, cross-references NVD and GitHub Advisories against only the packages you ship, and surfaces results ranked by EPSS — the exploit probability score that separates CVEs attackers are actually using from the ones sitting dormant for years. It runs locally via a single uvx command and feeds results into Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, or Windsurf. The free tier caps at 10 scans per day and one monitored project; teams that scan frequently or monitor multiple repos will hit that ceiling fast. At that point, the choice is a paid upgrade or a full migration to something like Snyk, which adds code-level remediation context VulnFeed does not provide.

Attribute	Bohay	VulnFeed
Pricing	Free	Paid
Price	—	$14/mo
Free trial	No	No
Open source	Yes	No
Has API	No	Yes
Self-hosted option	Yes	Yes
Platforms	Terminal, macOS (notch panel)	Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf
Pros	File lease system prevents overlapping edits from being assigned in the first place, so two agents cannot be handed the same path — without this, the collision only surfaces after both agents have already written conflicting changes. Sessions persist across terminal restarts and each agent reloads its own chat history automatically, so a dropped connection or accidental close does not mean repasting context flags and reconstructing state by hand. Isolated git worktrees per task mean agents work on separate copies of the repo, so a half-finished feature branch cannot break another agent's passing tests mid-run. The quality gate requires your test command to pass before a task counts as done and before its branch merges, so broken code does not land in the shared checkout without you catching it. macOS notch integration surfaces every agent's live status and blocked requests in a native panel, so you can approve an agent without context-switching away from whatever you were doing.	Reads your actual lockfile rather than scanning the full language ecosystem, which means you see only CVEs that affect packages you ship — not hundreds of irrelevant hits from packages you never installed. EPSS scoring surfaces CVEs by real-world exploit probability alongside severity, so you patch the vulnerability attackers are using instead of the one with the highest CVSS number that has sat unexercised for three years. Returns the exact upgrade version per package rather than stopping at 'you are vulnerable,' which means the fix is actionable inside the same conversation with your AI client. Continuous monitoring indexes new CVEs shortly after publication, so a vulnerability disclosed overnight appears in results at your next morning session rather than at your next scheduled scan. Flat-rate paid tier is not per-seat or per-repo, which means a team adding a second developer or a third project does not trigger a pricing jump.
Cons	No API is available, so any team that needs to query agent status from an external dashboard, trigger tasks from a CI pipeline, or hook bohay into an existing internal tool hits a hard wall — the only integration surface is the terminal interface itself, and teams with that requirement switch to an orchestration layer that exposes a programmatic interface. The tool is terminal-first and currently targets Mac for the notch feature; teams on Windows are directed to an alternate install path with no equivalent native monitoring surface, and the vendor page offers precious little detail on Windows parity. Orchestration depends on a test command as the quality gate — teams without a reliable automated test suite get no meaningful gate, meaning the merge protection the orchestrator promises is only as solid as the tests backing it.	The free tier caps at 10 scans per day and one monitored project — a developer running scans across multiple services or triggering scans on file save will exhaust the daily quota before noon, at which point scanning stops until the counter resets. VulnFeed identifies vulnerable versions and recommends upgrade targets but provides no code-level remediation: no PR generation, no inline diff, no analysis of whether your specific call path reaches the vulnerable function. Teams that need that layer move to Snyk or Socket, both of which offer it — at significantly higher per-developer cost. The tool set covers scanning, CVE lookup, monitoring, and alerts, but there is no policy enforcement layer. Teams that need to fail a build when a CRITICAL CVE with high EPSS is introduced have to wire that logic themselves outside VulnFeed.

Bottom line

Bohay is free while VulnFeed is paid; Bohay is open source; only VulnFeed exposes a public API. Choose based on which difference matters most for your workflow.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Bohay and VulnFeed?

Bohay is Free and open source, while VulnFeed is Paid. Compare pricing, free trial, API, platforms, and pros/cons in the table above on AIDiveForge.

Is Bohay better than VulnFeed?

It depends on your workflow. Use the side-by-side attributes (pricing, open source, API, self-hosted, platforms) to decide. AIDiveForge does not rank a universal winner — we publish verified facts so you can choose.