---
name: "academic-paper-review"
description: "Review a supplied paper by separating its claims, evidence and limitations. Use when the user needs: Get a structured review with page-linked evidence and unanswered questions."
license: "Apache-2.0"
metadata: {"version": "2026-10-17.1", "category": "research-analysis", "publisher": "AIDiveForge"}
---

# Academic Paper Review

Get a structured review with page-linked evidence and unanswered questions.

## Requirements

Provide the paper text or a readable file; source retrieval needs browsing access.

## Workflow

1. Identify the research question, contribution, study design and comparator from the paper itself.
2. Build a claim/evidence table with page or section references. Separate measured outcomes from author interpretation.
3. Check whether the method supports the claimed generalization: sampling, controls, leakage, uncertainty and reproducibility.
4. Write strengths and concerns in order of their effect on the central claim. Distinguish missing information from demonstrated errors.
5. End with specific questions or experiments that would resolve the main uncertainty.

## Worked example

Read `examples/input.txt` and `examples/expected.txt` before adapting the workflow.

## Acceptance checks

Do not invent experiments, citations or significance. The concern must follow from the supplied abstract.

## Limits

This is a review aid, not an independent replication. A short abstract is insufficient to judge the full method.

Worked example included. Model-specific performance and vendor compatibility have not been benchmarked.